JohnDavis2

September 11th Talk Page

Please do not attempt to argue NPOV arguments unless you have taken the time to read the archives and are sure that your argument has not already been covered by previous debates. Consensus has been reached, reguardless of how you persionally feel about it. Please make note of this in the future, as 'diving' in and sturing up what was already agreed upon can be concidered trolling. --Tarage 20:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Second warning. If you continue to refuse to listen to consensus, then I will do everything in my power to remove your ability to edit, or advocate such an action. You have insulted us, refused to listen to consensus, and continued to push your own POV. Do not make an enemy of the entirity of Wikipedia if you wish to continue to contribute here. --Tarage 23:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

No personal attacks

This is your last warning about making personal attacks like the ones you made here. --Haemo 20:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 19:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 19:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 19:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 19:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

How am I violating NPOV? I am making the article NPOV by changing the wording and making it neutral. Your threatening comments don't have any clarification whatsoever.

JohnDavis2 19:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnDavis2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was told that my changes were violating NPOV, but not given a clear explanation as to why. The reasons for my changes is to make the article NPOV, because it is not in it's current state.

Decline reason:

This is no excuse to violate WP:3RR. — Yamla 19:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.