JohnLonnnnnn

August 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Led Zeppelin II, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fair Deal (talk) 23:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aussie Ausborn (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Led Zeppelin II. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

J Milburn (talk) 12:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Listen, I've watched what's happening at Led Zeppelin (and related pages). Even if you're right, if the rest of the editors at the page disagree, it'll never go through. You need to make your case. And if you can't, you'll just be blocked for disruptive editing if you keep reverting against page consensus.

Convince them, or leave it alone.

And that's an honest suggestion, I have no opinion over the page's content. --King ♣ Talk 12:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)