JohnVla

Speedy deletion nomination of Liskom

A tag has been placed on Liskom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cliffsteinman (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

• Just make sure you expand the article within the next few days. The Xerox article is a good one to look at. History, products, things like that are some good sections. Make sure to cite your sources. :D Cliffsteinman (talk) 07:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• I just saw that. You'll have to ask User:Richardshusr about that. He should have checked everything out. Ask him to look at my talk page and the talk page for that article as there was a good bit going on there. From here though he is the person to talk to. Cliffsteinman (talk) 09:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• Thanks! I will try.

JohnVla (talk) 09:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

• Ok Richard did reply on his page: I did read your conversation. There's was no indication why this company is notable. As it stood, the article looked like SPAM and it was so short that there is no reason to think the article couldn't be easily recreated once you have enough material to make a real article. If there had been three or four paragraphs with at least some indication of why this company was notable (e.g. biggest vending machine company in Western Russia), I would have been more inclined to keep the article rather than delete it. --Richard (talk) 14:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC) --- I expect that your new version of this page is fine. Usually it's a bad idea to recreate a page that has been deleted but in this case you are correct in doing so and if questioned I will stand by it. Cliffsteinman (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • I also read through it and reworded it to have a little bit better english. Feel free to change something if I changed the meaning too much. Good job though, looks good. Cliffsteinman (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

New user creation

Wow you're creating a bunch of new users it appears. World domination? :P Cliffsteinman (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

• What do you mean? :) I did something wrong?

Autoconfirmed Users

Ahh yes, check out Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed users it just takes being a member for a little bit. Cliffsteinman (talk) 07:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)