Thank you both for your feedback, I took almost all of it to heart and made changes. I've added several images of the brain areas discussed in the anatomy section, I've added new hyperlinks that were missing, and I've changed the limitations section to "limitations and future research". I've also reorganized the headings, and cleaned up the last paragraph of the history section. I've also reworded the contribution section so that it is simpler and less cluttered. The only change I didn't make was elaborating on the distinction between learned and defined compression. In both the original article and the supplementary materials, the authors did not explain why one was used over the other. I did some additional background research among other researchers, and found that both learned and defined compression require describing complex math formulas that are involved in the computer science aspects of the model. My article is already quite technical, and I felt that if I elaborated on these concepts it might confuse readers. I felt that it was a rather small detail and did not justify adding complex explanations that may confuse readers and take the focus away from the Spaun model.
Start a discussion with Johnanstett
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Johnanstett. What you say here will be public for others to see.
