Johnman239

Apparently, I'm not the first user you've harassed

I have no idea what you are stalking my edits about, my edits are valid quit insulting me and making accusations about good faith edits 92.48.195.40 (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm stalking your edits, because they constitute vandalism. Johnman239 <3 (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

No, your reverting of my edits is vandalism. I'm correcting invalid edits and improving articles. You are being insulting and harassing calling my edits "vandalism"= I'm not destroying articles, I'm not posting false info, I'm not posting swear words or inappropriate material. Just because you disagree with me, please refrain from calling good faith edits "vandalism". Apparently you have a history of insulting people and over-riding their edits with patronizing and accusatory language. Please stop it or I'll have to report you.92.48.195.40 (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Just because you don't understand the references doesn't make it vandalism. Educate yourself about the subject, don't accuse people who are more informed of being vandals. 92.48.195.40 (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

WAHT ARE YOU TALJKING AAOBUT?

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Adobe Flash has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Redfarmer (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

That appears to have been a hiccup on the part of Huggle. It looks like we were both attempting to revert the same revision at the same time. Sorry about the confusion and cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

You're welcome, anytime! Happy editing :-) Lradrama 19:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Airwolf edit

I'm just over it, so no worries. The edit summary was left when the edit was done... maybe you were using a bot or macro that added the "vandalism" summary. No big deal, my edit has been incorporated into the article... not quite as it had originally appeared, but the info is there.

The original IP I posted from (WXLK) is a work terminal, so leaving messages on their talk page probably isn't a good idea. I should really sign up for a WP account soon. 24.254.10.80 (talk) 06:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Club America Edit

Im sorry but I was just listing a fact about the 2 teams I dont see why it could not be on there do you have a problem with that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.252.219.5 (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I didn't even revert your edit. That was Leonard^Bloom. Johnman239 <3 (talk) 07:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Middle Ages has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Becky Sayles (talk) 04:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Huggle revision collision! Johnman239 <3 (talk) 07:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 23c8c235be19c01aa87cf2096908c5f2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)