Jojo7727644it
Welcome
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
June 2010
edit
Your addition to Sukhoi Su-30 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a direct source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -Fnlayson (talk) 12:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations
editI've gone through some of your recent contributions and I have noticed that you have in many cases copied entire sentence and in some cases, paragraphs from the references you have cited. Please note that these still constitute copyright violations. If you are unsure whether one of your additions is a copyright violation or not, please consult WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPY before adding another reference. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Sukhoi Su-30MKI do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Lchfrontal2 .jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Lchfrontal2 .jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
December 2013
edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kerala may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- <!--
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
September 2014
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kerala, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for repeated deliberate introduction of factual error, first with a reference that reports a much lower figure, and then, after being reverted, with a reference that predates the claimed date by six years (a report from 2008 claimed to support an HDI-figure from 2014), and makes no mention whatsoever of any Human Development Index for Kerala. Thomas.W talk 12:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
April 2017
edit Your recent editing history at Kerala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please don't be UNRESPONSIVE. See Talk:Kerala#HDI. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)