Your submission at Articles for creation: Federated Shan States (Seperatist Government) (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 17:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, JomSensei! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Federated Shan States (Seperatist Government) concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Federated Shan States (Seperatist Government), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Federated Shan States (Seperatist Government)

edit
 

Hello, JomSensei. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Federated Shan States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced changes

edit

Please do not change or add text again without a source, as you did on various Shan and Tai related pages. Thanks. --Glennznl (talk) 08:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This also applies to repeatedly moving article titles. Please initiate a move discussion in the talk page of the article. Austronesier (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Shan State, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yue🌙 19:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multiple accounts on Wikipedia

edit

Hello JomSensei. Editors on Wikipedia are expected to use only a single account (with some limited exceptions), and are also expected not to coordinate off-wiki with other people in a manner that subverts our consensus-building processes. Before editing further, please carefully read our policy on sockpuppetry and take care to comply with the requirements listed there. It's fairly clear to me that you had some connection to @Tailuricus and LeSorboir: that did not comply with our policy. I am not going to sanction you over that, because it was quite a while ago; but further such behavior may be met with a block. Regards, Vanamonde (Talk) 12:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply