Hello.
Thank you for your contribution to one, or more, articles that are now organized under Data management.
Because of your previous intrest, you are recieving an invitation to become a founding member of the Data Management Wiki Committee.
The members, of course, will form and solidify the purpose, rules, officers, etc. but my idea (to kick things off) is to establish a group of us who will take responsiblity to see that the ideas of Data management are promoted and well represented in Wikipedia articles.
If you are willing to join the committee, please go to Category_talk:Data_management and indicate your acceptance of this invitation by placing your three tilde characters in the list.
KeyStroke 01:27, 2004 Sep 25 (UTC)
Hello, Jonathan. In 2011 you contributed an update on Instrumentalism. I am now proposing to do it again. If you are interested, I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on what I propose. Or do you know other editors who might be interested? Here is how I raise the issue for Philosophy of Science editors:
GUIDANCE REQUEST: Instrumentalism in the 21st century. I propose updating the article on “Instrumentalism” to explain how John Dewey and Karl Popper have been reinterpreted, making instrumentalism an active part of the philosophy of science project relevant to inductive reasoning, technology, and pragmatism. Please evaluate my proposal at talk: Instrumentalism, entries 20 and 21.
Thanks.TBR-qed (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)