User talk:Jonathan Harold Koszeghi/Archive 17

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sofffie7 in topic Talkback

Reminder (2)

edit

Hey Jonathan, could you please update the recent happenings at WP:Grey's? It's been almost 2 weeks... Thanks, Sofffie7 (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

As a note, I get that it's easy to forget. I always need to remind myself to send out the newsletter. The best way to remember, is to pick a day of the week, and always update the happenings on that day. For example, I always send out the newsletter on Monday, so maybe you could update the recent happenings the same day. As an advantage, me sending out the newsletter may remind you to update the recent happenings. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 17:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi Jonathan! I know you're busy with season 3 but when are you going to answer? It only takes a few minutes... --Sofffie7 (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Lol, I've read the message when you first sent it, but I was on mobile an by the time I got to my laptop, I completely forgot. Should get it done today! Thanks! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 10:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ok, glad to hear that. Thank you too :) --Sofffie7 (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Inactive user notification

edit

Hey Jonathan! M.Mario has now been inactive for a month so you may change his status to semi-active ;) Regards, Sofffie7 (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jonathan, due to your lack of performing your tasks, after numerous acknowledgements and warnings, a conference has been opened at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy/Administrative board, to help figure out the best solution. Please do not think you are being automatically removed from the board; you will likely be placed on a probation which would hopefully encourage you to complete the position's responsibilities. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 19:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's okay! :) I didn't want to be in the board in the first place. No worries. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
You're not being removed from the board. It has been decided that you will be placed on probation, meaning that you have to perform the duties associated with your position, at least once a week. The probation will last until the remaining board members can trust that you will continue to address the responsibilities. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 19:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:SGH

edit

Hi, Jonathan. I don't know if you read my recent message; you didn't respond. As I said, the conference at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy/Administrative board ended with a decision to place you on probation. Nothing major, it just means that you have to perform your job at least once a week. Today, I noticed you removed all userboxes from your page. This means you are no longer in Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants, in turn meaning that you are not a member of the project. The userbox deletion also removed you from Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy administrative board members. You have not been removed from the board, so that userbox should remain on your page. Your removing of the project member userbox leads me to believe that you no longer want to be a member of WP:SGH; I am hoping that's not true. I have to admit, when you said "I didn't want to be in the board in the first place", it came off as a bit rude. I know I asked you to join, but you ultimately decided to join the board yourself. If you planned on not doing your job, and saying things such as the quote above, it seems counterproductive. Nevertheless, you are still currently on the board, so I am assuming you are staying on, unless I hear otherwise. Please respond as soon as you can, TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 03:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, my God! I am so sorry that I made you think that! I only removed the userboxes to add them under Barnstars, becasue I just thought I didn't look good after GA Contributions. Might have forgotten... As for the work, I'll be more careful. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 10:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm just glad to hear you're not departing the project! :-) TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 14:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
How could I be? It's practically a hobby! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Lol, it's an addiction for me. ;) TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 14:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: September 10, 2012

edit
 
WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Newsletter: The Week of September 10, 2012

Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. Big apologies for the lack of the newsletter last week! We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy cast members, developed by TRLIJC19, is in the process of featured list candidacy. George O'Malley, written by Creativity97, was promoted to good article status last week! Cristina Yang, developed by TRLIJC19, Creativity97, and Sofffie7, is now a good article nominee! Our good article character count continues to rapidly increase! Jackson Avery is being developed to good article quality by TBrandley; we are excited for it to go live. Grey's Anatomy, developed by TRLIJC19, and Grey's Anatomy (season 3), developed by Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, are still in the preparations for featured article candidacy. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:

Tasks and Gudelines
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
  • Character Pages
  • Main Page (Grey's Anatomy)
    • Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
  • General
    • Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
    • Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.

Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, a repeat of last time, is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!

Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!

--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)

Grey's Anatomy (season 3) review

edit

I've read through the section, here are my thoughts:

  • Writing and filming
    • Fisher Plaza, which is the headquarters building for the media company Fisher Communications and Fisher's ABC affiliated Komo radio and television stations for Seattle, is used for some exterior shots of Seattle Grace Mercy West Hospital, such as air ambulances landing on the Komo Television newscopter's helipad. -- KOMO is an acronym and needs to be capitalized as such.
    • The last paragraph has absolutely nothing to do with writing or filming, and should be moved to 'cast' (which is the place for this kind of stuff.)
    • These paragraphs are really long, and should be split.
    • This section has a serious problem with the linking of common terms. Some examples:
      • romantic relationships
      • familial background
      • professional experiences
      • divorce
      • love triangle
      • extended arc
      • emotional state
      • morality
      • sentimentalism
  Not done Why would I do that? Not everyone has taken philosophy, and most of the readers wouldn't know what morality and sentimentalism mean. Why would you call them common terms? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
The average reader knows what those words mean. As I've said, vocabulary terms should not be linked. I have never taken philosophy, and I am fully aware of the word's meaning. We are not here to dumb down to people. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 15:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
      • philosophical
      • marriage
      • courage
      • vulnerability
      • mental confusion
      • optimism
      • happiness
      • stress
      • identity
      • reconcile
      • mother
      • husband
      • fright
      • frustration
      • childhood
      • near-death experience
      • climax
      • acting
      • auto racing
      • leisure activities
      • realism
      • being shot
      • career
      • medical condition
      • secret
      • single-minded
      • recover
      • confidence
      • the writers' blog
      • ego
      • inductive argument
      • exhaustion
      • fear
      • sex
      • conclusion
      • dramatic
      • comedic
      • That's as many as I'm listing, but there's quite a few more below what I've listed. Some are seriously ridiculous (ie. mother, husband, marriage, etc.).
I'm sorry, I don't understand your judgement. Why do these articles exist if they shouldn't be linked to? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 20:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
It's not my judgement, it's WP:OVERLINK. These articles exist for people who want to read about those specific subject, their origins, etc. They do not exist to be serially linked to. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 20:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. However, I do not agree with some of them. "Near-death experience", for example, should be linked. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
No, actually it shouldn't. The idea is that any words that are simply terms should not be linked. Obviously a reader can comprehend what that means without a link. We are not a dictionary. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 21:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. Thank you! ;) Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 15:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sadie Harris

edit

I've reverted your edit to Sadie Harris. As you probably know, the article was recently promoted to featured quality, and the paragraphs were split for organizational purposes. The first paragraph covers the character's storylines. The second covers the characters casting and creation, while the third covers her departure and reception. In the future, it would be nice if you left edit summaries, to explain why you did something. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 18:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Also, I just noticed you merged paragraphs all over the article, which I also reverted. I know you like having larger paragraphs in your articles, but it is unacceptable for articles of featured quality. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 22:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's not that I like using larger paragraphs, but I do not believe that 13-14 lines per paragraph can be looked upon as a "long" paragraph (20 lines or more per paragraph would be long, indeed). The ones I used for "my" article cover one topic and therefore can't be split. But it's okay if you don't agree, I'll see what the FAC reviewers will have to say on the topic. :) (By the way, I am nominating Erica Hahn for FA very soon.) Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 08:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Erica Hahn needs a fair amount of work before it will pass FAC. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 17:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Also, you are not a significant contributor to the article, so unless you become one, there will be procedural issues. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 17:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Inactive user notification

edit

Hey Jonathan! InfamousPrince has now been inactive for a month so you may change his status to semi-active ;) Regards, Sofffie7 (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hey Jonathan! I like your new user page design. Sorry about the lack of newsletters recently. My primary laptop broke, and I've been using this old dinosaur computer. I wrote the newsletter, and then the computer crashed. I got so frustrated that I didn't rewrite it. Hopefully my laptop will be fixed by Monday, and I can get back to developing articles and writing newsletters. Let me know what you thought about the GA premiere after it airs! You're on EST, right? TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 19:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm EST. But I am freaking out right now 'cause my internet and television are interdependent (same network) - the internet crashed, so did the TV !!!!! And I won't be able to watch the episode, I'm practically dying here! (now I'm editing from my iPad with 3G internet connection). I'm gonna wait until I have the TV/internet fixed, so please don't tell me any spoilers! Cheers! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Jonathan. I've opened discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy/Administrative board#Newsletters, recent happenings, and more, and I need your input. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 23:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please try to comment ASAP. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 21:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Season 3 episodes

edit

Hey Jonathan! I noticed that you're planning on developping some season 4 episodes so I was wondering, when are you going to finish I Am a Tree and The Other Side of This Life (Part 1)? I remember the reception for I Am a Tree was problem for you but I thought you'd be able to do it after Joey and I found some reviews... You used Alan Sepinwall's review in a whole paragraph but not the others; is there a particular reason for that? ;) --Sofffie7 (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Season three episodes are still a priority to me, but I have decided to try something new as it was getting kind of boring. I am so grateful to Joey for finding the reviews for I Am a Tree, and the only reason I used only one, is because I couldn't find the time to write the others. I have also started medical school. The Other Side of This Life (Part 1) was not anywhere close to my interests, as I originally planned to create an article that included both The Other Side of This Life (Part 1) and The Other Side of This Life (Part 2), but had to split it. Thank you for your concern! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kate Walsh and Mark Sloan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. You have new messages at Sofffie7's talk page.
Message added 13:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Regards, Sofffie7 (talk) 13:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply