A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jonie148. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.


I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Cindy(talk to me) 20:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, looking forward to getting started!

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
you are awesome Jonie148 (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

TT

edit

Hi there Jonie and welcome to Wikipedia. Yes that is correct there isn't an article of all the Take That songs, just the singles and promotional tracks that have charted or been accepted as worthy of an article. Can I ask what you have in mind regarding this article you suggest? I don't see any reason why not if it is sourced and not a repetition of the other articles. Are you suggesting something along the lines of this? or something completely different? Best, Yids2010 (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • Yes, the Gary Barlow Article looks similar to what I had planned, i was going to document each song released commercially against which albums/singles it has appeared on. Will probably work on it in my sandbox may take a few weeks, thanks for the feedback

--Jonie148 (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Take That songs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lulu, Progress, Progressed, Tavares, Beautiful World, A Hard Day's Night, Michael Ward and Everything Changes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leuven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William of Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Waifs and strays cover.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Waifs and strays cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Great Dreams of Heaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cassette
These Are the Days (Ian McNabb single) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cassette

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Still Got the Fever, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Widr (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Boots (Ian McNabb album) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boots (Ian McNabb album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boots (Ian McNabb album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Potency: The Best of Ian McNabb for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Potency: The Best of Ian McNabb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potency: The Best of Ian McNabb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of How We Live: At the Philharmonic for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How We Live: At the Philharmonic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How We Live: At the Philharmonic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Little Princess (Ian McNabb single) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Princess (Ian McNabb single) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Princess (Ian McNabb single) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Live at Life for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve (I Go) My Own Way

edit

Hi, I'm Righteousskills. Jonie148, thanks for creating (I Go) My Own Way!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I believe this page does not meet notability requirements because it failed to chart.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Chamtar Khan

edit

Your edit at Chamtar Khan has been reverted. Disambiguation pages are never orphans; they should have few if any inbound links. Think before you tag. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Live at Life (cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Live at Life (cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:I'm Game (album cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:I'm Game (album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:(I go) my own way (cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:(I go) my own way (cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Little princess (ian mcnabb album cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Little princess (ian mcnabb album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:She dont let nobody.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:She dont let nobody.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:I'm Game (album cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:I'm Game (album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:(I go) my own way (cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:(I go) my own way (cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Little princess (ian mcnabb album cover).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Little princess (ian mcnabb album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Jonie148. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — nerdfighter(academy) 16:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

The Teahouse Turns One!

edit

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


  Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Ian McNabb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Live at Life (Album cover).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Live at Life (Album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:(I Go) My Own Way (Album cover).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:(I Go) My Own Way (Album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm Game (Album cover).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:I'm Game (Album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Princess (Album cover).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Little Princess (Album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Burn"

edit

Where did you get that info from? Because according to the official source, "Burn" hasn't even charted yet. SnapSnap 20:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

No worries. :) SnapSnap 22:36, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swings Both Ways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

edit

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Icicle Works (album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Wave and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Jonie148. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — — Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions ·. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

File:Merseybeast (single) part 2.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Merseybeast (single) part 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Go into the light (cover).jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Go into the light (cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:You must be prepared to dream.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:You must be prepared to dream.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:These Are the Days (Ian McNabb single rerelease cover).jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:These Are the Days (Ian McNabb single rerelease cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Great Dreams of Heaven (re-release cover).jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Great Dreams of Heaven (re-release cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:My own way (album front).jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My own way (album front).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Take That III.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Take That III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Bridge

edit

The thing about our notability rules for musicians is that if you're going to rest a person's notability on getting playlisted, WP:NMUSIC #11 puts that on an entire network rather than just a single radio station. So if he got a song onto one of the BBC networks, then that would pass the criterion, but just getting onto Radio Caroline (a single radio station) does not. But even more importantly, it would take a newspaper or magazine profile writing about his getting playlisted for the criterion to be passed; a primary sourced audio or video clip of the song getting played, or a sworn affidavit from the radio station itself asserting that "yes, we've playlisted the guy", doesn't really cut it.

To pass any criterion in NMUSIC takes reliable source coverage — even if a person technically passes all of the NMUSIC criteria, they still fail the actual inclusion test if the claims that they pass it aren't adequately sourced. But the only sources that were present in the original version of the article were his own website, his own iTunes profile and a Blogspot post (two primary sources and an unreliable one), and that's not the kind of sourcing it takes to get a person an article on here. A primary source like his own website is acceptable for additional confirmation of basic biographical details after enough independent sources have been added to cover off the basic notability issue, but we can't keep an article that's based exclusively on primary sources.

I'd be happy to restore the article to sandbox space for you — it'll be at User:Jonie148/Joseph Bridge — but what it'll take to get the article back into mainspace again is evidence that reliable sources which are independent of him (e.g. daily newspapers, music magazines) have written about him. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit
 
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Jonie148,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Take That III.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Take That III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Ian McNabb, Digbeth 2014.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ian McNabb, Digbeth 2014.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion pending for File:Ian McNabb, Digbeth 2014.jpg

edit

Hello, Jonie148. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Ian McNabb, Digbeth 2014.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

  • If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
  • If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sir John Deanes college logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sir John Deanes college logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Jonie148. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blogspot reviews in articles

edit

Please do not add blogspot blogger reviews to album articles. Please see WP:ALBUM/SOURCE of a list of publications you can put in articles. Also for future reference, Reception goes above the track listing. thanks. --Jennica / talk 03:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Star Smile Strong

edit
 

The article Star Smile Strong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable soundcloud album. removed blogspot review. Couldn't find any notable review or charting information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica / talk 03:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Understood. The review site Louderthanwar.com usually publishes a review of new Ian McNabb albums, but hasn't done so far for Star Smile Strong. Can I please request that if or when the article is deleted, it can be copied to my sandbox space first, and I'll then work to merge it into Ian McNabb Discography. Cheers --Jonie148 (talk) 07:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Jonie148. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 06:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Jonie148! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 06:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Angels (Robbie Williams song)

edit

IP is back, not sure if they are the same person as MAXXII12 but they are on the talk section of the page. NZFC(talk) 20:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Thanks, sorry its taken me a while to respond, I was away from my computer for most of yesterday --Jonie148 (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Jonie148. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Regarding this, never appologize for fixing someone else's stupid mistake. :-p Thanks for catching that. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Zackmann08: No problem, and thanks in return for the edits you're making to the pages :). I shall endeavor not to be to quick to apologize in the future, I've just unfortunately had a few recent run-ins with hypercritical editors --Jonie148 (talk) 17:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Next time you run into one of those hypercritical people, ping me. I'll back you up (assuming you are in the right of course). :-) --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Haha, cheers --Jonie148 (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Dad Behavior

edit

The article Dad Behavior you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dad Behavior for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DanielleTH -- DanielleTH (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Dad Behavior

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Dad Behavior at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Dad Behavior

edit

On 5 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dad Behavior, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that critics found the couch gag of The Simpsons episode "Dad Behavior" remarkably "grim" and "bleak", as all but one of the Simpsons die during its otherwise familiar title sequence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dad Behavior. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dad Behavior), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

NikolajPeter1810

edit

Hey there, Jonie148! Nice to speak with you again! I filed an edit warring report and opened a sockpuppet investigation regarding NikolajPeter1810, which you can respectively find here and here. Do feel free to chime in if you're inclined. Cheers! KyleJoantalk 12:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks KyleJoan, I've added a brief comment on the admins' noticeboard. Thanks so much for getting these processes moving --Jonie148 (talk) 12:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Robbie Williams, Classic Album Selection album cover.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Robbie Williams, Classic Album Selection album cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to University of Chester

edit

I see that you recently reverted my edit to University of Chester, where I removed the rather bizarre claim that an institution which only received its university status in 2005 is somehow the fifth-oldest in England. I did see the Times Higher Education article that was being used to support this claim, but felt (and still feel) that this claim has rather dubious basis. Such claims are not unusual: for instance, the University of Manchester likes to promote itself as dating from 1824, tracing it back to the foundation of the Manchester Mechanics' Institute, even though the present institution was only founded in 2004. These subjects are discussed at length in articles such as Universities in the United Kingdom and Third-oldest university in England debate, where it is obvious that this is a complex question which cannot be answered just from a single article in THE.

However, what I take exception to is your edit summary "Wikipedia goes by sources, not original research - this information is sourced" treating me like some kind of ignorant newbie rather than an experienced editor. Yes, there was a source, and THE might normally be considered a reliable one, but policies on citing sources are clear that we, as Wikipedia editors, should not just parrot information from them verbatim. Rather, we should be thinking critically about what the source is claiming, whether it is credible, or whether it contradicts other information present either in the article in question, or on other Wikipedia pages. --RFBailey (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to politely ask you not to message me any further - I'm not here for aggression Jonie148 (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry if the message above came across as rather harsh. It certainly wasn't intended that way. However, I do think that the point about evaluating sources critically is an important one to make. Regards, --RFBailey (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Under the Radar Volume 2 for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Under the Radar Volume 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under the Radar Volume 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Davey2010Talk 20:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply