Speedy deletion of Stuart tennant

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Stuart tennant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Fredrik Ljungberg. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Tea constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 10:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Elderslie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Skarebo (talk) 13:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Alan Carr. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 13:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 15:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit

Hi. You were blocked for edits such as this, which appeared to be vandalism. If you have any more questions feel free to ask on my talk page! Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 17:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply