JordanSummers87
Tubi advertisement
editHi there! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, but would you mind not continuing to add promotional material for Tubi into various articles? The text reads like a press release for the company rather than actual encyclopedic material. An example: it is with confidence that footage films will continue to have a push for being one of the most sought-after independent film production companies
, which may well be the opinion of a Tubi spokesperson but should not be presented as a statement of fact. In the Marques Houston article it would be sufficient to say that Footgae Films has a deal with Tubi, without the associated text about how great you feel Tubi is. I notice you've also proposed identical pro-Tubi text for the Chris Stokes article, and the same applies. If you'd like to advertise Tubi that's great, but unfortunately Wikipedia isn't the right place. Hope that sounds reasonable, and all the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Striking one sentence: the Chris Stokes text was added by a new account called SlowSunday. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
SlowSunday
editHi again! I notice that on April 17 you added this text to the Marques Houston article, and three hours later a brand-new account named SlowSunday added the same text at Talk:Chris Stokes (filmmaker). Can you let me know the connection between these two accounts? If they are both held by you, then please be aware of the provisions of WP:SOCK which reads: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people
. All the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- yes I had to create a new account because a fradulant account user named Rift continues to update my client Chris Stokes wikipedia page with false accusations. there are already websites that have these accusations so I feel it is not fair to have it be on his wiki as well. Why is Raft so admit about Chris Stokes in particular ? feels like a personal vendetta. A lot of falsely accused celebrities dont have information like that on there wiki why does he have to. These fake gate keepers on here are being ridiculous. Can you please assist it blocking Rift and anyone else that continues to put the false sexual misconducts on his wiki. JordanSummers87 (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- You are not permitted to create new accounts while your old account is blocked. Furthermore, even if you were already blocked under another account, you would not be permitted to edit on behalf of your clients without making a disclosure in accordance with the paid editing guidance. Please desist. Girth Summit (blether) 12:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.