Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jordanblocker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Geophysical fluid dynamics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist(talk) 16:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Lindzen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your try for improvement Lolita Fashion: Confusions

edit

Dear Jordanblocker,

I reviewing your edit, because it was a nice try.

--Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit Aspects

edit

Case 1: Replace physical relationship with depiction of the sexual relationship ...

The problem is physical relationship can be interpreted as a relationship which flows from romantic to sexual.

A depiction of the sexual relationship, is directly using sexual as explicit term and is read as louder. The adverb depiction make it stronger.

Case 2.1: Popular culture instead of book

Popular culture is a term used as generalisation of culture and generic holistic word to describe; 'This' is important for me culture. However popular culture in Japan does not have to be the same as the culture in China or any other country. By limiting the scope the term can be approached from a material point of view; culture goods instead of an holistic perspective.

Case 2.2: sexually precocious vs. negative connotation

By using sexually precocious, the pressure is placed on a normal sexual development. But the point the writer wanted to make is that the meaning of the words became negative while it has from the point it was born not a negative connotation.

Case 3: Replace unacceptable with illicit

The problem is unacceptable is in linguistic sense not accepted now. (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unacceptable)

Illicit is containing an already negative tone, which make it more biased, in addition illicit is more used in lawful terms. (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/illicit)

Case 4: Replace originate with spread

This case I will review, for now this edit is assumed to be good.

You are right it can be assumed it originate in "the world science fiction" [Lotecki, Ashley, "Cosplay Culture: The Development of Interactive and Living Art through Play" (2012). Theses and dissertations. Paper 806.]. But the popularisation is possible because anime was also spread. I think their is a difference between Japanese Cosplay and American cosplay, because mainly the cosplay represent the cultural goods of their own. But because of the diffusion now. The (media)of the culture is mixed. In the article's context the spread referred to kawaii cosplay which refer to a look like lolita outfit. In this context American cosplay is not relevant, maybe as historical fact, but not as justifying of the confusion of the association of the outfit.

So spread is good, it does justify the historical context and does not impact the message the sentence wants to convey.

--Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Grammar edit reverted

edit

Hello, Jordanblocker, Your recent edit to Nevertheless, she persisted has been reverted to preserve the simpler sentence structure, using the infinitive form of the verb refer. Thanks for your editing work. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply