User talk:Josavala/sandbox

Joey, When reviewing your article addition, I was not sure if you are creating a new section for the page or adding to an existing article section. I did not see Higher Order on the page, so I assume you are creating a new section, right? With that said, you may want to continue to develop it. I understand that the higher order is God...were there specific instances you could list? Good job with finding credible sources to utilize. I saw that you mentioned a few sources in your plan. You may want to start to incorporate those citations into your draft now. Interesting stuff. I am doing Christian Pacifism, so there is sort of a connection between the two, and think it doe snot hurt to mention it in your draft. Keep up the good work and develop a bit more content.Tyler Chinappi (talk) 02:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Tyler Chinappi (talk) 03:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--Peer Review--

Joey- Your added section is off to a great start. I appreciate the ideas you have to contribute to the article! I notice that there aren’t any cited sources yet, although it looks like you had some in mind under the ‘Works Cited’ section from previous edits. It would be most beneficial to add citations to the content of your section, particularly after “it is often alluded to God’s commands.” I would also suggest adding the word “as” in “often alluded to as God’s commands.” I think “alluded to” is appropriate language as well, because “higher law” does not explicitly mean the Christian God’s law; though some refer to it as such, is it not a sole god’s law. Good work there. Yet overall, I think you could work on making your ideas more explicit. For example, I suggest adding the ideas of “obedience to higher law” that people use to justify violence; actions done in the name of God’s will; some people act violently because they believe God commands them to do so. Such clarifications would deepen the meaning of your contribution. You have a great idea and voice it in a non-biased way, so it would be great if you could even contribute a little more! In response to the Wikipedia user who commented on the article’s talk page about this article not being about Christian Pacifism, I agree with you that the inclusion of a non-violent Christian perspective is also vital to the article. Without this section, it could be perceived that Christian violence goes unchecked, but it clearly does not. In addition to your piece, consider adding a link to the Wikipedia Christian Pacifism article for reader’s further edification- that way the information is included in a way, without distracting from the article’s main points on Christian violence (about which the other user is concerned). Thank you for your contribution! Petra Sen (talk) 06:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)