JoshCube

Welcome!

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.

A few tips before you start doing a lot of editing:

• A few basic rules: Try to write from a neutral point of view, be bold in editing pages, and use Wikiquette.

• A handy page for newcomers is the welcome page. The Wikipedia tutorial also gives a lot of basic info that will help get you oriented on Wikipedia. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.

• When you post something on a talk/discussion page, you can sign your name by using three tildes (" ~~~ ") for your username and four (" ~~~~ ") for your username and a timestamp.

• Remember to provide an edit summary when editing.

• If you ever find yourself with nothing to do on Wikipedia, have a look at the Community Portal, you'll find that there's always something happening.

If you have any questions, comments, or just want to say hi, don't hesitate to write to me on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

Happy editing and have a great day! :-) Akamad 11:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Smash Bros. Online

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Smash Bros. Online may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- Longhair 11:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Smash Bros. Online,

Web specific-content³ is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

1. The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
   • This criterion excludes:
     • Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site. ⁴
     • Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report the internet address, the times at which such content is updated or made available, a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of internet addresses and site or content descriptions in internet directories or online stores.
   • This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. ⁵
2. The website or content has won a well known and independent award, either from a publication or organisation. ⁶
3. The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster. -- Longhair 12:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Josh, we need to win an easy award. Yoshi Lore has a cornucopia of these easy to acquire award. --FE411 19:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Hey Josh

Hey Josh, it's me FE411 (Fe411man). How are you? Are you going to get on with the fifth update so I can see my first submission on the site soon (remember the Black Knight submission)? Leave a message at FE411.

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 06:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

THE JoshCube?

The fanfiction writer mentioned on YTMND? -125.236.44.42 02:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

If this was really him then wow, I couldn't believe it either, but if it's not, then an imposter instead who could've just used his name and be known as a different person rather than the one you mentioned above. That being said, it may indeed be the legend that we know about. 24.188.203.181 22:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the creator of ssb online and joshcube are the same. -lopolo42

April 2012

Your recent editing history at Troll (Internet) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Reviewing the history of Troll (Internet) shows that each of your edits is unexplained (no useful edit summary), and has "(Tag: possible conflict of interest)" added. That is because it is obviously inappropriate for a user named "JoshCube" to add an item about "JoshCube", particularly when the only reference is something that clearly fails WP:RS. Please explain at Talk:Troll (Internet) why the proposed text is warranted, and provide a reliable source that verifies the significance. Johnuniq (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DMacks (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)