User talk:Joshbaumgartner/Archive/2008

This is an archive of User talk:Joshbaumgartner for threads concluded in 2008. If you wish to make a comment on an archived item please move the entry to the active talk page (or reference it at least) and add comments there.

See also User talk:Joshbaumgartner and User talk:Joshbaumgartner/Archive.

For older entries see User talk:Joshbaumgartner/Archive/2007.

For newer entries see User talk:Joshbaumgartner/Archive/2009.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news The Intelligence task force has been created. The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome! {{WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of Albuera Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) Battle of the Gebora Constantine II of Scotland Francis Harvey Vasa (ship) Wulfhere of Mercia New A-Class articles: 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.
Awards and honors Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007 Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: 1. Bedford — 7,600 2. TomStar81 — 5,500 3. Parsival74 — 5,200 4. FayssalF — 3,500 5. Roger Davies — 3,000 6. Ouro — 2600 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250 8. Cromdog — 2,200 9. BrokenSphere — 2000 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000 9. Maralia — 2,000 12. MBK004 — 1,340 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250 14. Sniperz11 — 1100 15. Burzmali — 1000 15. Cplakidas — 1000 15. Gimme danger — 1000 15. Raoulduke471000 15. TicketMan — 1000 15. Welsh — 1000 15. Blnguyen — 1000 Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Class box John F. Kennedy aircraft carrier

A tag has been placed on Template:Class box John F. Kennedy aircraft carrier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lamaa

A tag has been placed on Template:Lamaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lamaas

A tag has been placed on Template:Lamaas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lamas

A tag has been placed on Template:Lamas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lamav

A tag has been placed on Template:Lamav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Liy1960

A tag has been placed on Template:Liy1960 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Liy1988

A tag has been placed on Template:Liy1988 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Liy1992

A tag has been placed on Template:Liy1992 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 23:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Editing American Champion wikipage

I noted your 20 Feb. edit of the aircraft manufacturer American Champion - you placed the List of Aircraft into a wikibox. While I commend you for the effort, I was disappointed to see that you squished my previous breakout (of the various derivatives) into 4 categories. I spent considerable time getting them broken out, and feel that it is desirable to have such a breakout. Any chance you would reconsider your action? Thanks in advance.Raymondwinn (talk) 13:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

How to draw these maps that you have done?

Hi, HOw can I draw maps like what you done for example here: [1] I would appricite hint or help on how to do them. Farmanesh (talk) 23:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Weapon designers

Category:Weapon designers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 13:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:French Navy ships

Category:French Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:German Imperial Navy ships

Category:German Imperial Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:United States Army ships

Category:United States Army ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

A moved page question

Looking here in the history, and at the article page, you moved it from Arromanches (R95) (without a space) to Arromanches (R 95) with a space between the "R" and the "95". Why did this happen, just curious for that though. Dreamafter (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Dreamafter (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Press-on-Regardless Rally

Category:Press-on-Regardless Rally, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Imperial Beiyang Navy ships

Category:Imperial Beiyang Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Cathead age of sail merchant ships of the

Hi Joshbaumgartner, the above template seems a bit unnecessary to me as it is used in only one category (Category:Age of Sail merchant ships of the United Provinces), and in that case is slightly wrong anyway as it points to United Provinces which is a disambiguation page. The 2nd issue is easily fixable, but in general do you see a case for the retention of the template? Moondyne 06:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I've nom'd it for deletion here. Please comment. Moondyne 10:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Provinces of Indonesia

More white space than any article deserves and two maps is totally unecessary - please note that one will have to go SatuSuro 09:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The new map with numbers appear to have no correlation with the real world of Indonesian acronyms and numbers for everything - hence the usefulness maybe apparent to you with the list - but unless it can be proved that the number comes with a correlation to ISO or other Internal Indonesian coding I see no use for anyone for it in that form SatuSuro 09:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Hell I didnt meant to disparage the hard work you had done - I was wondering if there was some way to marry the info - my sincerest apologies for what was obviously a lot of hard work - I dont agree that we put the named variety at the top - I was just wondering when i first noticed it if there was a way to remove the lower map and somehow have the names and numbers on your added map! SatuSuro 10:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The probem is that with the relatively low literacy/high reliance on acronyms and even numbers in what i perceive as indonesian culture (i could be very wrong) I was wondering if there was some way to work on the map and numbering that you had worked on in some way tied in somehow to the readily known acronyms? or would the format be too tight SatuSuro 10:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

No biggie. The important work I think is adding the data, and that is still there. As for the numbered map, the numbers were only for reference from the table. If you can think of a better way to incorporate it, feel free. I think for Indonesia, having only the 33 provinces, the named map works okay. The numbered map was easy to make in Inkscape, so don't worry about that. Now you may have an idea by using the ISO code or something like that. The idea with numbers was that one can find a piece of information in the table, and then quickly locate the province on the map. Josh (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Well it is for me a biggie as we never have enough helpers in the Indonesia project and the constant issue is to weigh up the local usage of information against outside info - as found in some wonderful article title names which would ever mean anything to outsiders - So In a way the numbered map is in some way very sueful - have you ever done sequenced maps that we have in the australian project sequence of the development of the states? it would be brilliant if we could tweak/toggle between two maps on the same location SatuSuro 10:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead age of sail ships of the line of the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead age of sail ships of the line of the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead cold war icbm of

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead cold war icbm of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead guided bombs of

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead guided bombs of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead military equipment by country the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead military equipment by country the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead navy ships

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead navy ships requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead navy type the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead navy type the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead ships of the line of

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead ships of the line of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead tall ships of the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead tall ships of the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead war nuclear missiles of

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead war nuclear missiles of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead weapons of the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead weapons of the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cathead wwii ships of the

A tag has been placed on Template:Cathead wwii ships of the requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

your moving of List of artillery

Are you aware of how many links you have broken by moving List of artillery to List of artillery by type and using List of artillery for your own purposes ? Was this discussed and agreed to by others first ? A far more appropriate approach is to either change all the links first, or to use some other name for your list. You certainly shouldn't just wipe out page names and their contents just because you have some esoteric disgreement over the precise definition of a term. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 07:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Regardint the title "Field Artillery (eary 18th century)"

Thank you for your comments and I totally agree. Yes, the title was indeed too general and I have therefore changed it from "Field Artillery (early 18th century)" to "Swedish field artillery (early 18th century)" Regards, --Malin Randstrom (talk) 08:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Cruise missiles by operator

Category:Cruise missiles by operator, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 08:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:APILAS Finland.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:APILAS Finland.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)