Journalist0071

Welcome!

Hi Journalist0071! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Largoplazo (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm hoping to create pages around healthcare and entrepreneurship! Journalist0071 (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navina Evans (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Navina Evans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Journalist0071! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Navina Evans has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Navina Evans. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navina Evans has been accepted

Navina Evans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Hey theroadislong, please could you kindly look over my second wiki page? I've made the recommended changes Journalist0071 (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Prash Ladva moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prash Ladva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. gobonobo ^{+ c} 05:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey! just updated some more sources and gone through the article again :) thanks a mil for checking over it! Fingers crossed this time, but here to learn and improve before the next article Journalist0071 (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Prash Ladva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prash Ladva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prash Ladva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JBW (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, please could you clarify why reference 12 (UK Top 100 List) is not "noteworthy". I believe this to be an extremely significant accolade, as would many. I think there has to be a clear distinction between searching for "significant coverage" vs "noteworthy" - as then there is subjectivity. Who does this get escalated to?

In any view, this is only my second written article, and I followed a similar structure to the first article. I will move onto creating the next one. But I am curious about the question I have asked above. Journalist0071 (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)