June 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mauritius. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:Christianity in Mauritius

edit

When I said, "Christianity not that relevant for Mauritius anyway.", I did not mean that Christianity in Mauritius is irrelevant. Sorry for giving impression otherwise. This was in response to your insertion of "Mauritian Creole forms the basis of the Mauritian Culture, for example the language, Sega music, Christian values and food." There are degrees of relevance. Christianity in Mauritius is definitely something relevant (I wouldn't have recreated the article otherwise) but not so relevant as to say 'Christian values' are foundation of (a majority-Hindu) society. In response to the other parts of your edits, I say: the day Creoles are mentioned first on the Mauritius is the day Native Americans is listed first in the article United States. You might think it's unfortunate but that's the way the way it is. Munci (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply