Jpyeron
I have deleted this article because it provided no useful context; there was a better version of the article that was deleted before due to lack of coverage in independent sources. That can be undeleted if you would like to work on it, but you should make sure to find references to Reliable Sources (see Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability policies for more information). —Random832 15:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on SubEthaMail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:SubEthaMail. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Carados (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
You have recently recreated or reposted material at SubEthaMail which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -Carados (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on SubEthaMail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:SubEthaMail. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Carados (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Final warning
edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as SubEthaMail, you will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Never saw any of these until today. Jpyeron (talk) 22:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UL 365 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Helpful guidelines and policy
editHello, here are some resources to answer your questions. Not all of them apply to the articles you are creating, but they are all very important:
- Please read WP:COI, WP:NPOV, and WP:OR, WP:WEIGHT. (these are about neutrality)
- Then read WP:N, and for biographies read WP:BIO, WP:BLP. (these are about notability).
- Then read WP:MOS (the Wikipedia manual of style), WP:LEAD, WP:SECTION, WP:MOSLAYOUT, MOS:APPENDIX, WP:ARTICLETITLE (these are above article structure)
- Finally read: WP:V, WP:IS, WP:RS, and WP:SIGCOV (these are about sourcing).
- Wikipedia does use a lot of unusual terms, the Wikipedia:Glossary is a helpful resource for quickly looking up unfamiliar terms.
- Some other helpful guidelines you will see referenced often are: WP:PGE, WP:5p, WP:SYNTH, WP:IS, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN, WP:BRD, WP:EW.
Concerning the articles you are creating, WP:N, WP:V, and WP:OR are probably the most important.
There is a huge amount of information above, no one is expected to remember it all right away, but it is the best place to start. If you are going to edit Wikipedia, especially creating articles, you need at a minimum to be aware of and try and understand the above. It will take time to learn, but it will make your editing more productive and useful.
Again, don't let the above quantity of information be intimidating, everyone has to start learning somewhere and others here know it takes time (and often trial and error). Any questions you have can be answered at the WP:TEAHOUSE (fastest response), or you can ask on my talk page (slower).
Greetings from Los Angeles, // Timothy :: talk 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Spillage of classified information for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spillage of classified information until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.