User talk:Jrdioko/archive5

Thanks for the welcome

I assumed it was an automated post till I actually looked in on you. Nice of you to drop by and welcome me to the neighborhood. I have since paid it forward in a welcome to a newer user. Glenn6502 02:33, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 05:31, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome

I've been around anonymously but I think it's time I started helping out quite a bit more!

Roleypolinde 06:22, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

RFC pages on VfD

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:49, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

How do you do this???

Hi Jrdioko, maybe you know an answer to this question. There is a madman (I really don't know how else to describe him -- or her? I doubt it, though) who has been attacking a number of pages on the Wikipedia for quite a few weeks now. He should definitely be expelled. I was wondering what the procedure was. His username is Antifinnugor and he has been attacking in particular the pages and the users he lists on his user page (and the respective talk pages). This person knows absolutely nothing about linguistics (something that is clearly evidenced by every statement he makes), yet he has injected an enormous amount of false controversy in fields in which there is no controversy at all among experts. Personally, I studied and taught historical linguistics (at a high academic level) for two decades, so I think I can be a good judge of this. However, this is not just my opinion, but the opinion of every other user involved. Pasquale 18:25, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 02:45, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wow!

File:Happy pit bull.jpg

Don't bite -- slobber!

Thought the welcome talk was just an auto-message.

Thanks for taking the time. Oh, and I learned a new trick becase of it.

Boisemedia 01:01, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Request From A Beginner

Hi Jrdioko, I appreciate your dedication to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made the decision to remove an addition I had made in the entry for sandwiches. Obviously, my addition was not a substantial one, and I was merely tinkering with the entry seeing as how Wikipedia is still a bit of a novelty to me. However, what actually upset me was your subsequent action: removing another of my entries that I had posted for the University of San Francisco. Unless you attended USF, I doubt that you know little of its history or the topic which I chose to expand upon. In my opinion, your decision to delete my addition to USF Football was a knee-jerk reaction to my previous entry about sandwiches. I do not doubt that you are an excellent administrator (or sysop), but please do not be overzealous. In the future I feel that you personally should challenge yourself to make the Wikipedia experience a more welcoming one. 24.14.4.166 02:10, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 22:42, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Dear Jrdioko,

You have accused me(203.200.95.130)of making changes to Crane(machine) and some other stuff.But let me assure you I never ever visited those pages.The only change that I made yeseterday was on the page of "Roger Federer". So, I suggest you to please check your records.

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 19:43, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

User:169.229.36.24

is there a rule against making personal attacks on your own user page? Xtra 02:05, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 02:20, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jrdyke

Please stop making these false accusations against me. I don't know what your problem is, or why you have targeted me, but it seems very pathetic, and you need to stop and get a life. If you continue making threats, I will have to report you and have you blocked from Wikipedia.

vandalism

your user page was vandalised by 129.170.246.208. Xtra 04:25, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---

What do you mean vandilise?, when did i?

---

from Jon Herms....hey man, stop being rude, that rdsmith guy has been deleting my valid and accurate articles, maybe he should let people post factual information and stop trying to be a mommas boy....

User IP 168.190.200.39

Just fixed the vandalization of Katharine Hepburn. He doesn't seem to care about warnings on his talk page. Just an FYI. Katefan0 15:40, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Help with comment on my talk user talk page

Hi

I just got this comment on my user talk page: User talk:Master Of Ninja#Can It?. I don't understand what it actually means, and I'm not even sure what the blocking threat is for. Is this just a troll of some sort? I would be grateful for your assistance. - Master Of Ninja 08:17, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Update: User:Utcursch fixed the problem. Thanks - Master Of Ninja 11:48, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that

I was just playing... I am interested in being a user, is that a possibility?

Thanks again

• GF

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 05:19, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Apologize

Please unblock me. i apologize for the edit. This is my initial visit to Wikipedia and i truly enjoy the content. I will NOT edit outside of sandbox in the future. ayanna

Contact me - Importat

Hey, Can you contact me "m y s p a m a i l"@yahoo.com please ? There is my personal name on one of your pages and I need it removed, thank you.

Copied to Wikipedia:Request for immediate removal of copyright violation.  – Jrdioko 20:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Hey Jrdioko, it is related to Indopedia. Is it the same thing ?

Indopedia is a topic-specific fork of Wikipedia. See [1].  – Jrdioko 00:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Replaced a redirection by writing an article

Hi Jrdioko,

I have written this page: Year 2038 problem. It used to be redirected to Unix time. However, the info related to the actual subject on that page was rather limited. So, I took the liberty to remove that redirection and write an article which (I hope) covers the subject. Is that permitted? I also linked back to the orginal article. Is that the way to go about it?

Thanks for your time.

MadIce 08:12, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 20:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer, Jrdioko. MadIce 20:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

210.54.53.12

Hi, feel free to ban this address as it is a school, and no doubt we will see more vandalism from it in the future.

Don't forget to sign!

Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. Alphax ^τεχ 15:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 21:50, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Not sure I remember; possibly one with an image deletion warning or an image page or something. My instinct is to check the history when I see an unsigned post, and slap {{subst:tilde}} ~~~~ on their talk page without much further thought. Sorry for being such a pain. Alphax ^τεχ 08:18, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

24.62.119.238

I noticed on User Talk:24.62.119.238 a last warning directed at 24.62.119.238 dated 10 Feb. This IP has made two vandalisms to Doom today. Please consider taking action :-) -- Jon Dowland 19:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

---

hey sorry I was just trying!!! I didn't know I can edit pages!!! SORRY!

No women

Not so far from the truth, alas — but thanx for the revert. I'm easy to amuse, as you can see.... Bill 23:11, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Jtkiefer 05:52, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

---

User:Jrdioko - I see where you participated in the matter concerning Abraham Lincoln's sexuality that was discussed and voted upon on Talk:Abraham Lincoln. There has been a lengthy and exhausting discussion surrounding this exact same issue at Talk:Elvis Presley and the archived Talk pages as well. Because this has the potential to create a new standard for what is acceptable sources, I thought that you might want to be aware of it.

If the policy consensus you and others arrived at on the Abraham Lincoln issue is set aside in the Presley article it will result in new ones for countless others. I think your group discussion that arrived at a determination of what constituted a proper source should be defined by the Wikipedia community and set as firm policy which would go a long way in helping to substantially reduce the tiresome and repeated edit wars. Thank you for your interest. Please note I have left the same message for others who worked on this matter. Ted Wilkes 20:17, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand why you deleted Lissette?

I'm new to Wikipedia so perhaps I misunderstand the process somewhat but is it correct that you deleted Lissette Álvarez simply because you don't like her?

" 04:30, 5 January 2005 Jrdioko deleted "Lissette Alvarez" (No me gusta Lissette Álvarez) "

Lissette was an integral part of the nueva ola music movement in Puerto Rico and was a bigger name in the 60's than both Chucho Avellanet and Lucesita Benitez whose articles remain. And since Lissette is mentioned repeatedly within Wikipedian articles she shouldn't have been removed. For example, within http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chucho_Avellanet there is:

"Helped by Alfred D. Herger, he was a member of a group of teen sensations that included Lissette Alvarez (to whom Avellanet got married), Lucecita Benitez..."

"...he was able to explore his ability both in the show hosting and acting fields when he hosted, alongside Lissette Alvarez, the popular El show de Chucho y Lissette."

"He also participated, with Lissette, in a famous Schaeffer Beer commercial, where he sang the jingle Cerveza Schaeffer es la mejor cuando se toma mas de una! (Schaeffer Beer is the best when you drink it more than once!!)."

"In 1994, he, Lucecita Benitez and Lissette Alvarez rejoined forces for a one-night only concert."

It makes no sense to have Chucho remain and not Lissette! Lissette was a bigger sensation than Chucho. It would be like having an article about Sonny and Cher and then deciding to delete Cher!AndiP 03:42, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 03:39, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Personal information being displayed

Hey Jrdioko, I already asked you once this but you never did it. Could you please, remove my name (S o r o u c h e) with no space, appearing at http://www.indopedia.org/Indopedia:Deletion_log.html.

And also this page

http://open-encyclopedia.com/Deletion_log_oew

Because search engines picked up my name on that log, and the search is being retunred showing my name associated with the definition. Please take immediate actions. Thank you.

Response on your talk.  – Jrdioko 07:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Because I will be on a Wikivacation on your actual birthday, the Happy Birthday Association is wishing you a happy birthday for today! JaredW 12:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

John Steven Lasher.

Since you study at UC Berkeley you are close to the offices of Intrada Records, which distribute many recordings produced by Mr Lasher. Suggest that if can find a precious moment or two, you ring up Doug Fake (real name) at his Oakland office.

Jeremy Sefton-Parke--Kinopanorama widescreen 02:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Kinopanorama overlap

Each of the three films are marked with a small indent at the bottom of each frame. The indents are used by the projectionists, who rack-up the frames, to match the overlaps. This is why I suggested that someone else have a look at the frames and arrive at the figures. So, if you personally are interestred, or if you know someone else who is, please email me direct.--Jslasher 22:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello!

Well, this is kind of really late...but thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia! --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 23:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Hello. I'm sorry that you have suffered all the vandalism from this IP address; I have no control over that since this computer is used by several guests from the same hotel. Because of that, I request that you not block this IP address, but I hope you don't have any more problems with this IP address. Again, my sincerest apologies, 192.251.125.85, alias Ruff.

Thanks for the kind welcome!

Yes, this is incredibly late, but it has been quite a while after I noticed your message on my talk page, but I still wanted to say "thanks" -- Denial land 01:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Pitchpipes

You have officially blown my mind. I was going on strong anecdotal evidence: members of the 30,000 member, all-male Barbershop Harmony Society overwhelmingly use F-F. I will now have to corner someone with a C-C and compare. We should continue the discussion on the Pitchpipe talk page. -- Ventura 14:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Stubs

Hello Jrdioko,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks!

Ksbrown^talk 10:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC) == Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Earth, you will be blocked from editing.

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

My media file has been nominated for deletion & some are deleted

I have no idea of why Wikipedia wants to delete my images, that all are from my college and I'm a webmaster of St. Mary's College Chilaw Old Boys association, Colombo circle. I have full rights to do the uploading and adding to my college page in Wikipedia. due to technical reasons our OBA web site is down at the moment. You can find it in this link near future. http://www.smcobacmb.org/

this is my article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/St._Mary%27s_College,_Chilaw

Hasiwarna (talk) 01:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)HasiwarnaHasiwarna (talk) 01:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Invitation

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Jrdioko. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Jrdioko.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jrdioko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jrdioko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jrdioko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jrdioko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to return

Hello, Jrdioko!

I note that your user page is out of date and that it has been some years (at least ten) since you've done much editing. I'd like to invite you to return. Since you were active in RC patrolling while you were active here, you may be interested in using Huggle, which is a tool designed for that purpose. If interested, take a look. I've also placed some resources for people reengaging with the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators, which you may find helpful. If there is anything you'd like to discuss, I'm available to help, and can be reached either on my talk page (preferred), or via email (for discussion not suitable for public disclosure).

Best wishes,

UninvitedCompany 17:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)