Your submission at Articles for creation: Hierarchical Heavy Hitter (Data Science) (November 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jrob kiwi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hierarchical Heavy Hitter (Data Science)

edit
 

Hello, Jrob kiwi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hierarchical Heavy Hitter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hallo, in this edit you removed a link with summary "(removed a broken link. Commented in discussion page.)"

  1. I can't see any comment at .... Ah, looking again at the talk page I see you were writing a lengthy post while I was adding the archived link.
  2. But in general it's better to add {{dead link}} initially rather than just delete a link, surely.

PamD 09:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I didn't know about the dead link tag. Learn something new every day :-) Jrob kiwi (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply