Do you work for the Mike Martinez campaign or know him personally? TexianPolitico (talk) 13:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
editHello Jrut112. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mike Martinez, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 04:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Mike Martinez page
editWho are you and why do you keep attempting to censore the Mike Martinez page? Do you work for his campaign? All of the "controversy" section is completely sourced. TexianPolitico (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Stop
editPlease stop deleting entire sections of the Mike Martinez page simply because you don't like the information contained therein. If you continue you may be banned from Wikipedia. TexianPolitico (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
editYour name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jrut112 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mike Martinez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yasht101 05:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Blocked
editThis account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jrut112 and for disruptive editing at Mike Martinez. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |