Jschauhan2016
Speedy deletion nomination of Kala Jagriti Samiti
editHello Jschauhan2016,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kala Jagriti Samiti for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
editWelcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kala Jagriti Samiti
editHello Jschauhan2016,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kala Jagriti Samiti for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
editPlease do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kala Jagriti Samiti with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 13:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Kala Jagriti Samiti, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Repost of Jais Chauhan
edit A tag has been placed on Jais Chauhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 14:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself
editWelcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.
The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 14:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Block evasion
editIt appears that you are Jschauhan and have returned to again create an article about yourself. Please note that if you continue to do this you will be blocked. I'm alerting the original blocking admin, JamesBWatson, to see if he thinks editing privileges should be revoked for block evasion. —SpacemanSpiff 17:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like I didn't realize that you've been socking too long now. Jschauhan2013 and Jschauhan2016 are also you, so it's a clear case of block evasion and socking. Please let me know why you shouldn't be blocked right now for continuing this behavior over so many years. —SpacemanSpiff 17:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Jschauhan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 11:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC) |
- It appears that you aren't ready to give up your disruptive behavior, so I've blocked you. Note that you as an editor are blocked, not just this account. —SpacemanSpiff 11:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)