User talk:Jschlude2/Phenylethanolamine

Group 10 Reviews

Review 1

This article is off to a good start. The chembox especially looks really good, you have a lot of information. However, you might want to add more sections in the main part of the article, because you currently only have two. You might want to expand what you have and maybe split it up into a few sections. Otherwise, the formatting and content look pretty good. Ktmass (talk) 00:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 2

You have a good amount of information in you chem box. I think that you need to expand on your article maybe by adding information on the structure and then you could describe the properties of it. Also the last two references you have need to be put in correctly. You could maybe explain the U.S. Regulations section because it is kind of random, but other than that your page looks good. Mpate52 (talk) 01:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 3

The chembox has a lot of good information in which there are only few categories but a lot of information for each category. The other rest of the article just needs to be expanded. Maybe usage or history of this compound can be added. Also, the U.S. regulations section should be expanded if possible like explained why it is on Hazardous Substance List and maybe what happens if the chemical is come into contact. smunoz2 (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 4

Great job on the chem box, it a sufficient amout of information including a good hazard section. I would encourage you to possibly add a couple more categories, maybe more about the function of the chemical and its impact on us. I would've liked to see more about the application of it. Format looks fine, except for the last two sources, which should be uniformed with the rest of the references. (Jcyeung2 (talk) 05:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC))

Page-move

Articles do not belong in the "Wikipedia:" namespace, so I reverted your User:Jschlude2/Phenylethanolamine→Wikipedia:Phenylethanolamine move. There is an existing Phenylethanolamine article, so you are welcome to edit that to add additional content (with refs, etc.) as usual. DMacks (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)