October 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Meteorology has not been reverted, as it appears to be constructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was unconstructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Race and ethnicity in the United States Census, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Nakon 22:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2011

edit

  The recent edit you made to Giant panda constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 22:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boredom, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Boredom was changed by Jshook08 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88481 on 2011-01-03T23:24:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KrakatoaKatie 23:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jshook08 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was joking with you guys. You are so serious, I just wanted to mess with you. I have a lot of facts in my brain, anyway.

Decline reason:

And now you know what happens if you mess with us. Bye. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.