User talk:Jspa6292/sandbox
Catholic-Protestant Relations refers to the socio-political and theological relations and dialogue between the two sects of Christianity. This relationship began in the 15th century with the beginning of the reformation and thereby Protestantism. A number of factors contributed to the reformation. Namely, disagreement on the nature of salvation and by extension a number of doctrines including the sale of indulgences and more. These disputes led to a schism whereby Protestants chose to split from the Roman Catholic Church and resulted in the Council of Trent (1545-1563) which clarified the Catholic approach to Protestantism from then on. A series of significant events followed which divided Europe and culminated in a number of states transitioning from Catholicism to Protestantism as their state religion. However, many remained Catholic. Much of the schism and the events it caused can be categorised as violent and tumultuous. However, with the rise of secularism, Catholic-Protestant disputes are generally constrained to the intellectual sphere.
Theological Disputes
editCatholic-Protestant theological dissent was birthed in 1517 with the posting of Martin Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses which outline ninety-five objections against Catholic doctrine. These included distinction between clergy and laity, the Roman Church’s monopoly on scriptural interpretation, the sale of indulgences, the nature of salvation, and more[1].
Salvation
editLuther’s understanding of salvation was one of the radical departures from Catholic dogma. Luther highlighted that Christian salvation was a free gift from God which led him to criticise the sale of indulgences as a means by which one can ‘attain’ heaven. He stressed the importance of a faith-oriented process of salvation, distinct from his view of the Catholic works-oriented salvation. This also led to a shift in the understanding of grace[2]. This doctrine is known as sola fide (faith alone)[3].
Following in the footsteps of Luther, French Attorney John Calvin further developed the reformed theology of salvation. While Luther maintained that salvation was available to all, Calvin introduced the doctrine of predestination. Based on the pretext of human’s sin-enslaved will, and salvation being the sole work of god (not man), Calvin insisted that certain individuals were predestined for heaven and others weren’t[4].
Authority
editA significant foundation for both parties’ doctrines is the nature of their authority. The Protestant position assumes scripture to be the sole foundation of Christian doctrine. This has led to heavy criticism of the Catholic Church’s position which places scripture on par with tradition[5].
History
edit16th Century – The Reformation
edit— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jspa6292 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The 16th century began the reformation which resulted in the formation of Protestantism as a distinct entity to Catholicism. In response, the Catholic Church began its own reformation process known as the ‘counter-reformation’ which culminated in the Council of Trent. Trent was responsible several practical changes and doctrinal clarifications were made[6]. In spite of this, the two parties remained notably dissimilar.
After years of the spread of Martin Luther’s ideas, Protestants submitted their statement of belief at the Diet of Augsburg (1530) [7].
In 1540 Pope Paul III approved the Society of Jesus or ‘Jesuit’ order which was largely to combat Protestantism [8].
The Regensburg Reconciliation (1541) was a failed attempt by Catholics and Lutheran Protestants to reunite[9].
The ‘traditionally Roman’ nations of France, Spain and Italy endured the Roman Inquisitions as of 1542. The inquisitions were aimed at all those considered heretical by the Catholic Church but predominately targeted Protestants as it was the most prominent. Technically the Church itself never executed heretics (as Cannon Law forbade the shedding of blood). Rather, heretics were handed over to civil authorities for punishment[10].
Disputes between the Catholic Emperor of Germany and the princes thereof resulted in the Schmalkaldic War (1547). Protestants were defeated, but later on Protestantism became legally recognised as a valid religion[11].
In 1555 the Peace of Augsburg allowed Catholics and Lutherans to follow the faith of their ruler – regardless of what that may be – within Germany[12].
France
editThe reformation in France took on a unique flavour which lacked the public, state and church support found elsewhere in Europe. The first French Protestants were subject to persecution in the form of death or exile. From 1562 conflict raged between the Protestant Huguenots and Catholics. In 1589, Protestant Henry IV succeeded the throne raising the hopes of French Protestants. However, any reforms he may have intended to make were shattered by an alliance between French Catholics and the king of Spain who forced him to convert. The 1598 Edict of Nantes gave Huguenots the right to practice freely while retaining Catholicism as the nation’s official religion[13].
Holland
editThe Netherlands was quick to embrace the reformation and soon assumed a Protestant identity. Though it faced opposition by its ruling power – Spain – the Dutch independence movement dispelled with Spanish imposition and allowed for Protestant development[14].
Great Britain
editEngland and Scotland endured the longest of the European transformations in response to the reformation. Henry VIII declared himself Head of the Church of England (1534) in response to Rome’s refusal to sanction his divorcing of Queen Catherine. He still, however, died a Catholic. Officially, the reformation in England began under Edward VI (1547-53) led by Archbishop Thomas Cranmer of Canterbury. Queen Mary (1553-58) persecuted Protestants in an attempt to restore Catholicism to England. Ironically, this only served to enhance Protestant determination. Following this trend, Elizabeth solidified Protestantism as the state religion of England permanently[15]. Overall, the reformation led to the seizing of all Catholic Church assets in Britain, persecution of clergy, and the virtual destruction of Catholicism as a significant socio-political force in the region[16].
17th Century
editIn 1618 the Dutch War of Independence ended and Catholic Spain ceased to rule over the region. Much of this war is considered to be on religious grounds[17].
The 17th century saw Protestant-Catholic tensions rise particularly in Germany leading to the Thirty Years War from 1618-48. This war saw the destruction of much of Central Europe and divided much of the continent along Catholic-Protestant lines. Swedes, Danes, and French were all involved. The war culminated in the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) which granted Calvinists and Lutherans equal rights to Catholics[18].
New Englanders were deeply suspicious of Catholicism and in 1647 banished all Catholic clergymen by law. In 1689 the Maryland assembly forbade Catholic baptism (outside of already Catholic households), the practicing of Catholic mass, and more[19].
In 1685 king Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes leading to the prosecution of Protestants in France[20].
18th Century
editProtestant Britain and its colonies remained apprehensive towards the Roman Catholic Church. North America was particularly hostile. As of 1700, immigrating Catholic clergy were imprisoned upon arrival in New England. In 1725 Spanish-born Londoner Antonio Gavin wrote ‘A Master Key to Popery’ which was adopted in Protestant sects across the British empire. Gavin described Catholic clergymen as ‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’, purposefully teaching erroneous doctrine, power-hungry and more. Similar sentiments were preached throughout the Empire in the legal, academic, and religious spheres. In 1731 Massachusetts Supreme Court Judge Paul Dudley wrote ‘An Essay on the Merchandize of Slaves and Souls of Men: With Application thereof to the Church of Rome’ describing the financial greed of the Roman Church. Among others, Dudley’s will made provisions for a lecture on the ‘detection, conviction and exposition of Roman Church idolatry’. Jonathan Mayhew, Paster of Boston’s West Church, also preached on the idolatry of transubstantiation and the equating of oral tradition with sacred scripture. The late 18th Century saw a series of new laws introduced to British North America to curtail the immigration of Catholics and dispossess those already dwelling there. In 1757 Catholics lost their right to bear arms. Anti-Catholicism soon became intertwined with nationalism. Thus, when conspiracies of secret relations between Rome and the British Monarchy spread, colonials preferred to revolt from Britain. This contributed to the American Revolution (1765-83). However, the revolutionaries eventually diverged from this position given their reliance on funding from Catholic France and to avoid conflict with colonial Catholics of Maryland, Philadelphia and Quebec[21].
In contrast, the Quebec Act of 1774 provided protections for both English Protestants and French Catholics in Canada[22].
19th Century
editThe 1800s saw a period known as the Second Great Awakening for Protestantism in the United States. Prominent figures such as Charles Grandison Finney (1792-1875) advocated against Roman Catholicism amongst other perceived evils. The American Bible Society – a Protestant organisation – advocated for the unification of Protestant denominations in order to combat Catholicism. Deep distrust existed from Protestants towards the Papacy [23].
In 1821 and again in 1825, the English House of Commons oversaw proposed Bills regarding the emancipation of Catholics. In both instances, they were overturned given the heavily Protestant nature of the England’s House of Lords[24].
Catholic Austria recognised Protestantism as a legal religion in the 1860s[25].
In 1871 the Protestant rulers of Germany undertook a program known as the kulturkampf (culture struggle) which saw the suppression of German Catholicism. The German Ministry for Education’s Catholic Bureau was abolished, and openly political priests were prosecuted. In 1872, the Jesuits were expelled from Germany[26].
In 1895 Pope Leo XIII attempted to make amends with the Church of England in his apostolic letter Ad Anglos. In 1896, however, Leo maintained Catholic superiority and declared Anglican orders invalid[27].
20th Century
editThe 20th Century saw many developments in the relationship between Catholic-Protestant relations. In 1910, the International Missionary Conference was held in Edinburgh in an attempt to unify non-Roman churches. Protestant denominations responded to the possibility of unification with varying success. Catholic representatives were present at the council, but merely as observers[28].
The Conversation at Malines (1923-27) were talks between some representatives of the Catholic Church and Church of England which Pope Pius XI ceased. No real change eventuated from these talks[29].
In 1950 the Roman Catholic Church widened the gap between itself and Protestantism by defining and enforcing the doctrine of the Assumption of Mary under Pius XII[30].
The Second Vatican Council (1962-65) aimed to move towards Christian unity of all denominations. Doctrinal unity was reached to some degree with different denominations and a ‘shared Bible’ was introduced[31].
Present Day
edit— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jspa6292 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
In the spirit of Vatican II, the Catholic Church has embraced a more open approach to Christian unity to both Protestants and Eastern Orthodoxy. Pope Francis declared division as ‘the work of the father of lies’ and that, “all Christians are disciples of Christ: that they are one, that they are brothers! He doesn’t care if they are Evangelicals or Orthodox, Lutherans, Catholics or Apostolic… He doesn’t care! They are Christians!” [32].
Many Americanised remnants of Anglo-American-style denominations of Protestantism remain deeply distrustful of the Catholic Church. Ecumenism with these sects appears unlikely[33].
References
edit- ^ Finn, Daniel (2013). Christian Economic Ethics: History and Implications. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 161.
- ^ Finn, Daniel (2013). Christian Economic Ethics: History and Implications. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 161.
- ^ Congar, Yves (2019). A History of Theology. Minneapolis: ATF (Australia) Ltd. p. 186.
- ^ Finn, Daniel (2013). Christian Economic Ethics: History and Implications. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. pp. 165–67.
- ^ DePalma, Margaret (2004). Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations. Kent: Kent State University Press. p. 7.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 275.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 251.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 278.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 251.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 282.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 251.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 284.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 255.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 255.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 258.
- ^ Congar, Yves (2019). A History of Theology. Minneapolis: ATF (Australia) Ltd. p. 186.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 255.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 285.
- ^ DePalma, Margaret (2004). Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations. Kent: Kent State University Press. p. 7.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 285.
- ^ DePalma, Margaret (2004). Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations. Kent: Kent State University Press. pp. 8–12.
- ^ DePalma, Margaret (2004). Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations. Kent: Kent State University Press. pp. 8–12.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 308.
- ^ Congar, Yves (2019). A History of Theology. Minneapolis: ATF (Australia) Ltd. p. 186.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 338.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 337.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 339.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 349.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 410.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 410.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 410.
- ^ Dowley, Tim (2018). A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 410.
- ^ DePalma, Margaret (2004). Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations. Kent: Kent State University Press. pp. 8–12.
Bibliography
edit- Dowley, Tim. “A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity”. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2018.
- Finn, Daniel. “Christian Economic Ethics: History and Implications”. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2013.
- Congar, Yves. “A History of Theology”. ATF (Australia) Ltd., 2019.
- DePalma, Margaret. “Dialogue on the Frontier: Catholic and Protestant Relations”. Kent State University, 2004. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jspa6292 (talk • contribs) 11:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)