Jtbknyc

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda G. Mills (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda G. Mills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jtbknyc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Resubmit Draft:Linda G. Mills

Hi Jtbknyc, if you are still online resubmit the draft and I will accept it. Mills is notable. S0091 (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much - I just resubmitted. Jtbknyc (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done. For future reference, see the notability guidelines for academics. I am assuming you are the IP that submitted the draft originally. Although clearly notable, I could not accept a two-sentence draft with only one source. S0091 (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

I"m a bit concerned that most of the article is sourced to NYU, which she is associated with and therefore would count as a WP:SPS. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Blaze Wolf, see WP:PROF. It is one of the exceptions to GNG and references to the academic institution is acceptable. The president of a large university such NYU is automatically notable (see also List of presidents of New York University). S0091 (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Ah alright then. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

the first article was actually not submitted by me - I stumbled upon it when I went to submit... Jtbknyc (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Wonderful! Don't worry about the layout 'tag" I just placed on it. Other editors should hopefully come along and spruce it up. I am surprised the article was not already created honestly. S0091 (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda G. Mills has been accepted

Linda G. Mills, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)