Juanholanda

Possibly unfree Image:Edersant.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Edersant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC) --B (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jesus. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. B (talk) 22:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

OK. NOw I undersatnd. Just adding back biblical quotes that get erased..... Now I know the rule. Thanks Juanholanda (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Rodney Stark appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 22:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rodney Stark. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Rodney Stark, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)