Fair use rationale for Image:Comingchinawars.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Comingchinawars.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cocktaileconomics.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Cocktaileconomics.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Spam in ACT (Accelerated Corporate Transformation) Process

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ACT (Accelerated Corporate Transformation) Process, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ACT (Accelerated Corporate Transformation) Process is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ACT (Accelerated Corporate Transformation) Process, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

"then explain why you believe this article should not be deleted on its talk page. This will alert administrators to permit you the time to write your explanation." --Orange Mike | Talk 20:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest?

edit

Are you involved in the public relations industry or as a book agent/publicist? --Orange Mike | Talk 20:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply