User talk:JulesN/Archive
Character order list of One Tree Hill
editHello, Julesn84. The character list edit-war that is going on with the One Tree Hill article, where newbie and random Wikipedian editors keep putting either Peyton Sawyer before Brooke Davis or Brooke Davis before Peyton Sawyer is silly...except for when it is actually correct. You reverted User:Niall Feighney's edit where Niall placed Peyton Sawyer third on that character list...before Brooke Davis (who actually comes sixth), but Niall was right to place Peyton Sawyer third. And I will place her third as well on that list, and make sure that all the other characters/actors on that character list are placed in the order of which the opening credits air. If you revert my edits on that front, they will be placed back, and I may seek out a Wikipedia administrator to report this problem. I'll see you around. Flyer22 02:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I received your message, though it originally made it to my user page instead of my talk page. I see, and it's nice to know that you'll be more careful with the One Tree Hill character list. I've seen some of your other edits, and I want you to know that I feel that you are a good editor. Make sure that a message you deliver to another editor here at Wikipedia, though, ends up on their talk page instead of their user page. Take care. Flyer22 05:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Notts SU Exec officers
editTrue, you're absolutely right. Sorry for my prematurity! Jdcooper (talk) 13:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Helen Darville
editThanks for cleaning up the bio. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I removed your CSD, I see absolutely no advertising. asenine t/c 16:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Sid Roams
editWhy did you delete the page? That was quite unnecessary of you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by H.N.I.C. Part 2 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
regarding cleanup
editwhy has the cleanup template been added to Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Spain), The article was only created about 40 seconds ago.Kevin hipwell (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
I changed your cleanup template to an expand template instead,
I will also use the <!-- comment --> tag to hide the image code,
as for lack of images that is explained in the discussion.Kevin hipwell (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for commenting them out for me :)Kevin hipwell (talk) 01:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for repeating my edit summary and tagging a new page with "possible copy vio" a mere 9 minutes after I'd first saved it. Whilst I appreciate the importance of policing such things, do you not think that a hair-trigger reaction is hardly the best way to encourage those editors who create content? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Velbus (protocol)
editHello Julesn84, can you please help why my article Velbus (protocol) was deleted. I do not see straight advertisement.
The article about C-bus, is similar to my article and did not get deleted: The C-bus article clearly states company names, it even advertises the Clipsalcompany.
Pleas help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefran (talk • contribs) 07:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC) --Stefran (talk) 10:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Louis Bozon AfD
editIf you want to put withdrawn on an AFD, then put withdrawn and give your reason why. That is all. Chris (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm arguing to redirect, so you cannot withdraw it at this point. Cheers, CP 15:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help on the Louis Bozon article in saving it from deletion. I really appreciate it. Chris (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Also with the Dario Poggi article. Chris (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help on the Louis Bozon article in saving it from deletion. I really appreciate it. Chris (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Redirects
editDon't place a nocontext tag on a redirect. It's not supposed to give context, just be a cross reference. DGG (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Alumni House notability
editHi- I'm just wondering why a notability tag was placed on Alumni House? I saw that when I created the page that it had been made and deleted before, however that was an entirely different Alumni House not at all related to the one I made. If that's not the reason then I'm just not exactly sure why there's that tag? -Jrcla2 01:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The building is notable because it is a registered historic building in the City of Williamsburg and also because it the central building for all William & Mary alumni and/or historical functions. It is a 19th century building that is one of two "focal points" of the College campus; the other being Blow Memorial Hall. If you still seem unconvinced I implore you to (at least for a while) renounce that notability tag because I am presently working on creating & expanding a College of William & Mary collection of articles. I just started two days ago (see the date of creation for the W&M template for proof). I want to build up the College's pages so that it is comparable to most other important Division I colleges or universities. If there a "WikiProject College of W&M" I'd be its biggest contributor. So again, please reconsider. Thanks for explaining yourself. -Jrcla2 22:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Two things: One, I had heard that the Alumni House was a registered historic building, but after some research it turns out that information is incorrect. However, I have found an article online that denotes notability (even I think you would agree as such). Click here for the story. The part I want you to notice the most is the very last paragraph:
"If the building to the far right of Sneden's Williamsburg panorama is the Bright House, as I believe (and as J. T. Baldwin's words allow), the Alumni House is an antebellum structure, one of only a few buildings on campus to have witnessed Civil War Williamsburg."
- After reading the article and seeing that in there, don't you think that being one of only three buildings on the entire campus (of the nation's second-oldest college no less) to witness the Civil War in person makes that building mentionable? -Jrcla2 (talk) 01:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I hope I have explained the notability of Aubrey William de Vere Beauclerk to your satisfaction on the article's talk page. The article may not look like anything yet and may never be anything fantastically long, but Beauclerk is mentioned in Mary Shelley's biographies because she had a relationship with him. I believe that this gives him notability. I hope to flesh out the article a bit in the coming days! Thanks. Awadewit (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Please be more careful when tagging articles for speedy deletion. An article which referenced a reliable source or published work is not speediable under A7. —Dark talk 09:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Cohors II Gallorum
editPlease explain why this article has been proposed for deletion. Regards EraNavigator (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. There's nothing special about this unit. This article is intended as the first in a project to provide individual entries for every known Roman auxiliary regiment (all 400+ of them) as there is for each Roman legion. Each article will be linked to the main article List of Roman auxiliary regiments. I don't see why the content is described as unreliable. It is based on the best and most up-to-date compendium of the available evidence for auxiliary regiments. Regards EraNavigator (talk) 20:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't understand your position. Are you saying that Roman auxiliary regiments should not have separate articles on them? If so, why not? In Wiki's 2 million + articles, I have come across many less "notable" than this. EraNavigator (talk) 21:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for withdrawing the nomination. I understand your desire to improve our work here but I am very pleased that you were so willing to reconsider. We need more people like that around here. Let me know if I can ever help. -JodyB talk 02:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers. I'll admit that I was a bit quick off the mark, but at the time I thought that an article which basically stated the existence of the cohort, and a list of what it might of done was not notable. --JulesN Talk 02:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Julesn84, how I can delete unsuccessful article by my self? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimachorny (talk • contribs) 18:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Afd
editI have nominated two Relient K-related articles for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Relient K albums. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you. —ScouterSig 03:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
2000-2001 Demos deletion
editHi. You've put a speedy deletion tag on 2000-2001 Demos according to section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion...But that criteria says "A7 applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on" - 2000-2001 Demos was an album, so the speedy deletion was wrong. And according to WP:Notability (music)#Albums it is notable if I can show enough reliable sources. So what I am gonna do now is just show more reliable sources. Thanks for reading.-- LYKANTROP 16:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I did nominate it for a speedy deletion, under the wrong criteria it is true, however when it was delete by Cobaltbluetony he did so because it fell foul of WP:CSD#G4: Recreation of deleted material: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000-2001 Demos. - JulesN Talk 16:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks-- LYKANTROP 16:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Foldback (sound engineering)
editI would like to add the refence back in. While the Judy Garlan reference only refers to the date, the McCune Sound reference talks about the monitor. Do you have a problem with this? Robert.harker (talk) 21:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
edit |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 29 | 14 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Transparency | ||
| WikiWorld: "Goregrind" | Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 30 | 21 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
editSorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 31 | 28 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 32 | 9 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 33 | 11 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 34 | 18 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Help wanted | ||
| WikiWorld: "Cashew" | Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
editHi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Need you to block an IP
editHi JulesN - If I remember correctly, you're an admin right? Could you please help me out and block IP address 128.239.147.137 (click this for their edits). It is obvious vandalism and they keep undoing my reverts of their vandalism. Even after I warned this IP about stopping, less than three hours later they did it again just to annoy me. Please indefinitely block this obvious troll. I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. -Jrcla2 (talk)(contribs) 01:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 35 | 25 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 36 | 8 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 37 | 15 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
editBecause the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Campaign Medals template
edit
I just saw your navigation box for the first time today and found it a great improvement to the medal pages since the last time I was using them. I had to come and tell you I think its great. The ribbons are also an excellent touch. Just letting you know that your hard work has not gone unnoticed or unappreciated. sassf (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
editThree issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
WWI campaign medals
editThe four ribbons I changed are somewhat unusual, in that they use a moire pattern. I only know of one other ribbon using that style - the WWII Atlantic star.
Copying a portion of a discussion from User talk:Miesianiacal#Ribbons:
- "if those you put in the article are definitely the right appearance." - As much as any 2D rendering of a 3D object can be "definitely the right appearance". They look much more like my grandad's ribbons than the pictures I replaced!
- e.g. It's reasonably similar to this, which although not quite like my ancestor's, is reasonably similar to it. (Whereas this one looks like it's made out of a different type of fabric! The text here says: "The ribbon is watered silk with red, white and blue stripes. This is the same ribbon as that worn on the 1914-15 Star.", but quite obviously they don't look the same at all.) This looks close. This isn't so good.
- You may (or may not) find this of use.
- Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Urn logo.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Urn logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, JulesN. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)