Julex1524

Welcome!

Hello, Julex1524! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome!

Hello, Julex1524, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I am very new to Wikipedia and find it quite the challenge. Anyone have any positive advice? 20:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Julex1524 (talk)

• Hi, Julex1524. What do you mean by positive advice? Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

    Hi Adam,

I struggle with navigating my way. How do I send a message to someone in my class?

• We're on your "talk page" right now, which is where an editor would come to send you a message (see this for how talk pages work). My talk page is User talk:Adam (Wiki Ed). You can see the list of students in your course from the students tab on the dashboard. Click on their user page and you'll see a link to the talk page nearly at the top of the page. You can leave a new message with the "New section" button, which will open a window where you can post a message with a title and it will show up as a new section on their page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
• When someone leaves a message for you on your talk page, you will see a notification at the top of the page. If you want to get the attention of an editor on a page other than their talk page, you can "mention" or "ping" them by typing and linking their username: [[User:The Editor you want to ping]]. You'll also see (as one of the answers on the link I posted above shows) editors use other methods like {{u|The Editor you want to ping}} or {{ping|The Editor you want to ping}}. All three will notify that editor (see Julex1524) but only if you sign your messages with ~~~~, which tells the software you're making a new comment.
• Notifying editors is valuable if you aren't sure they are paying attention to a particular discussion. In this case I happened to see your reply, but if you want to ask me a question about an article or on your talk page, you should "mention" me as described above. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC) Yes.

Feedback requested

Hi, Julex1524. What can I help you with? Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I had to add something to the sandbox and talk and it said to have you review.

• Is Draft:Political Sociology what you're referring to? Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes

• The first thing I'd point you to is the existing page on Political sociology, which while short has some good information and sources. I don't know what your exact assignment is, but that may help. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 10:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Adam,

Can yo look under my talk - Proposals and Edits and see if I am on the right track with class assignment? Julex1524 (talk) 15:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.Julex1524 (talk) 16:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please advice what training assignment. All state complete. Julex1524 (talk) 16:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Mine all say complete. Please specify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.63.122.12 (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Reading topics about Political Sociology by Max Weber I would use his definition that it as the interaction of people through the daily functions of citizens in society. It is more about asking the questions as to why we think and behave the way we do in certain situations and how it is linked to political topics.

Bibliography – Political Sociology 1). Blasi, Anthony J. Sociology of Religion in America: A History of a Secular Fascination with Religion. Abstract: Sociology of Religion in America tells the story of the controversies involved in the development of a scientific specialty that often makes news in America. The evidence it presents runs contrary to the many myths about the field. Sometimes viewed by scholars as a backwater, actual evidence from the 1890s to the 1980s shows that sociology of religion had a steady presence in sociology by not only different cultures and politics within each religious group it was actually in a mutually supportive relationship with religious organizations. Brill, 2014. 2). Manza, Jeff, and Clem Brooks. "Class and Politics." Classes and Politics. Accessed June 02, 2016. http://sociology.as.nyu.edu/object/JeffManza. Abstract: Recent debates over the relationship between class and voting in democratic capitalist societies have focused primarily on the question of whether levels of class voting have declined. As a result, few studies have distinguished between "class voting" as an outcome versus class factors as causal mechanisms of vote choice. This distinction is critical to understanding what role class-related factors play in explaining vote choice - and thus to advancing debates over the changing relationship between class and political behavior in the U.S. and elsewhere since the 1980 Presidential election. Our analyses also show that while class politics increasingly competes with other salient bases of voting behavior, the political impact of social issue attitudes has not displaced the class cleavage in recent presidential elections. 3). Lindenberg, Siewart. "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential ..." Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985. Accessed June 2, 2016. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/274291266_An_Assessment_of_the_New_Political_Economy_Its_Potential_for_the_Social_Sciences_and_for_Sociology_in_Particular. Abstract: The best thing that ever happened to social science is its beginning (at the time of Adam Smith) and second best thing that ever happened to social science is the new political economy. The new political economy is first and foremost an "economics of politics," that is the study of political processes by means of economic theories and models. Examples of topics studied are: voting, political party competition and coalition formation, constitutions, the supply of public goods and interest groups, bureaucracy, property rights, public policy and finance. 4). Crameer Walsh, Katherine. "Talking about Politics : Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life." (Book, 2004) [WorldCat.org]. March 2010. Accessed June 03, 2016. http://www.worldcat.org/title/talking-about-politics-informal-groups-and-social-identity-in-american-life/oclc/491071602. Abstract: The central tendency of public opinion results from ‘collective deliberation”, but we conceptualize this deliberation largely as a process that occurs among political professionals within the mass media, the government, and interest groups (page and Shapiro 1992; page 1996). 5). Prasad, Monica, Steve Hoffman, and Kieran Bezila. "Walking the Line." Walking the Line. April 2016. Accessed June 03, 2016. http://pas.sagepub.com/content/44/2/281.abstract. Abstract: Over one-third of the white working class in America vote for Republicans. Some scholars argue that these voters support Republican economic policies, while others argue that these voters’ preferences on cultural and moral issues override their economic preferences. Julex1524 (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Bibliography – Political Sociology 1). Blasi, Anthony J. Sociology of Religion in America: A History of a Secular Fascination with Religion. Abstract: Sociology of Religion in America tells the story of the controversies involved in the development of a scientific specialty that often makes news in America. The evidence it presents runs contrary to the many myths about the field. Sometimes viewed by scholars as a backwater, actual evidence from the 1890s to the 1980s shows that sociology of religion had a steady presence in sociology by not only different cultures and politics within each religious group it was actually in a mutually supportive relationship with religious organizations. Brill, 2014. 2). Manza, Jeff, and Clem Brooks. "Class and Politics." Classes and Politics. Accessed June 02, 2016. http://sociology.as.nyu.edu/object/JeffManza. Abstract: Recent debates over the relationship between class and voting in democratic capitalist societies have focused primarily on the question of whether levels of class voting have declined. As a result, few studies have distinguished between "class voting" as an outcome versus class factors as causal mechanisms of vote choice. This distinction is critical to understanding what role class-related factors play in explaining vote choice - and thus to advancing debates over the changing relationship between class and political behavior in the U.S. and elsewhere since the 1980 Presidential election. Our analyses also show that while class politics increasingly competes with other salient bases of voting behavior, the political impact of social issue attitudes has not displaced the class cleavage in recent presidential elections. 3). Lindenberg, Siewart. "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential ..." Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985. Accessed June 2, 2016. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/274291266_An_Assessment_of_the_New_Political_Economy_Its_Potential_for_the_Social_Sciences_and_for_Sociology_in_Particular. Abstract: The best thing that ever happened to social science is its beginning (at the time of Adam Smith) and second best thing that ever happened to social science is the new political economy. The new political economy is first and foremost an "economics of politics," that is the study of political processes by means of economic theories and models. Examples of topics studied are: voting, political party competition and coalition formation, constitutions, the supply of public goods and interest groups, bureaucracy, property rights, public policy and finance. 4). Crameer Walsh, Katherine. "Talking about Politics : Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life." (Book, 2004) [WorldCat.org]. March 2010. Accessed June 03, 2016. http://www.worldcat.org/title/talking-about-politics-informal-groups-and-social-identity-in-american-life/oclc/491071602. Abstract: The central tendency of public opinion results from ‘collective deliberation”, but we conceptualize this deliberation largely as a process that occurs among political professionals within the mass media, the government, and interest groups (page and Shapiro 1992; page 1996). 5). Prasad, Monica, Steve Hoffman, and Kieran Bezila. "Walking the Line." Walking the Line. April 2016. Accessed June 03, 2016. http://pas.sagepub.com/content/44/2/281.abstract. Abstract: Over one-third of the white working class in America vote for Republicans. Some scholars argue that these voters support Republican economic policies, while others argue that these voters’ preferences on cultural and moral issues override their economic preferences. Julex1524 (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Political sociology has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 03:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Can you tell me WHAT you removed? Remember we are a new class so we need precise directions and we are being graded in a courseJulex1524 (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC). Thank you!

• Hi, Julex1524. This was the edit they reverted. You added commentary about the article into the article itself--so when a reader looked up Political sociology, they saw your comments at the bottom in the "see also" section. Remember that any changes in the article space are immediately visible to readers and if they're inappropriate or not up to the quality a reader can expect from a wikipedia article those edits may be removed.
• Also your contributions will remain in the article history even if they are reverted, so your instructor will be able to track your work. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political sociology may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• pluralists believe, have ended the domination of the political sphere by an economic elite.[[Subsequent "chaos" starting with Kenneth Arrow, have indicated that the median voter prediction
• managerial sector and diversified shareholders, none of whom can exert their will upon another.][<Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page>,<Arrow 1963,McKelvey 1976. See Sen 1970> <Sen.Amartya K. 1970.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political sociology may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political sociology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2001. Web. 29 Sept 2009. From: <http://books.emeraldinsight.com/display.asp?K=9780762307562></ref> [Political convictions are created through a process of our personal interactions and opportunities

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.

I have completed all training available to our course please specify. Julex1524 (talk) 12:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, We are into week 7 of our class and the weekly training still has not been added. Julex1524 (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Draft:Political Sociology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draft:Political Sociology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:Political Sociology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Political Sociology

Draft:Political Sociology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Political Sociology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Political Sociology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Julex1524. You have new messages at DASonnenfeld's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I moved your draft

Hi Julex1524. I moved your page to User:Julex1524/Political Sociology. which can be used as a scratch pads for additions you would want to make to Political sociology. You don't have to use that page as a scratch page, you can use your sandbox (which has a handy link on the top of the page when you're logged in) or you can make the changes live in the article itself provided you carefully check your edit for errors.

There is still the "Miscellany for deletion" tag, but I think that process will not result in your page being deleted so you can feel free to ignore it. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi, Where did you put the article? Also - do you see any training Modules that we are suppose to complete each week and where to find them? Julex1524 (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey Heidi, I do not yet have any edits in my article that I can have you review. I am waiting for some feedback on what I proposed to the talk page of my Nuclear Whistleblower page but have not had a response yet. I will make some edits to it before the week ends because I do not believe that anyone is going to respond. I will let you know when they are made so you can review them! --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 03:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, Heidi. I have added a minor edit on my article Nuclear whistleblowers. It is under the Arnold Gundersen tab if you would like to review it. Much luck editing! --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey all you need to do to view my edits is click on the "View History" tab next to read and edit and you can see all of the edits. If you click compare two edits it will show you what I have done. The first box on the right is just a few grammatical errors. The last box is the small section that I added in. --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

You can find my edits by clicking on this link: Nuclear Whistleblower. Then just follow the steps that I listed above!It is a very confusing system. I am just getting the hang of it now. --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Division of labour has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Division of labour was changed by Julex1524 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863426 on 2016-06-13T19:52:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Copying content into wikipedia

Hi, Julex1524. You recently added this edit to division of labour. That is copied entirely from this site. You cannot copy material from the internet and add it to wikipedia articles, because wikipedia depends on the text in it being free to use for anyone. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Political sociology

Hi Julex1524. I moved your draft work to User:Julex1524/Political sociology. The reason you can't use the move functionality to add your content is because the subject you're writing about already has a wikipedia article: political sociology. The move functionality is used when you are drafting a new article in your sandbox and want to move it to the eventual location. Creating a new article and adding to an existing one are different challenges. Before adding to that article, take a look at what is in it now and how that information is presented. What is missing from that article which you can add? What did you learn about the subject that isn't covered in the wikipedia article? Let me know what comes to mind and I'll walk you through how to turn that into a contribution to the page. In the meantime, please do not move your draft page anywhere. Let's work on the changes there. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

• Ok. I saw your contribution. You can reply here in this thread (which is how wikipedians talk about articles or processes (or to users), on their respective talk pages. So you're interested in how mass media influences what political sociologists cover? I've made some changes to the article political sociology. Tell me where you think information about mass media would go in there. A new section, perhaps? Let me know here (not by editing the article itself). Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Hi Adam, i added my own comment on the subject as to what I have learned. Also, our assignment was to move it out of the sandbox so with it being here will I still get the proper class credit? Thank you. Julex1524 (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Your contributions are recorded on the dashboard regardless of where they happen on wikipedia, so your work doesn't need to be in the article space to be graded. I don't know what your exact syllabus is and the person to answer those questions is your instructor. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
• There's nothing there with my name because no wikipedia article has signatures from editors who created it. The article Mass media was written by dozens of different collaborators over a period of years. You can see what changes I made in the page history.

Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Adam, I have been using my talk page and made a new

Hi, I can see the article but I don't understand how I know what you changed without looking word for word for something different? I thought there was a page to show the update and be able to make comments or corrections to.

• There's no inline way to make comments on articles themselves. The specific change I made is here. On the left is what was on the page before, on the right is after my changes. Each page on wikipedia has a corresponding talk page, as I described above, where editors make comments about the page. Those comments are only seen by people who visit the talk page and not by someone reading the article themselves. The page on political sociology doesn't have a very active talk page but other articles may have had many discussions in the past or are active now. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Is that your update in yellow asking me to list 4 types? Julex1524 (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

• I'm not asking you to do anything in the update. That change itself made because I felt the article could be divided by those sections. I think the four types you're referring to were there when I made the edit, but showed up in the diff because I moved the text. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Adam, I have been using my talk space and added a section - Ideas and Edits. The work I had in my sandbox was moved by Wiki but do not know where so I started fresh as to not fall behind. I have submitted it for plagiarism verification and all seems good. I will continue to work through here. Any input will be welcomed. Julex1524 (talk) 14:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Copied material into an article

You cannot add this to an article--it is copied word for word from doi:10.1177/2053168015608896 (page 565). You cite it as a source but copying and pasting content from sources is a copyright violation and is plagiarism. Those authors didn't write that text for a general interest encyclopedia--they wrote it for their article and their audience. I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to stop adding material in article space until I know that you understand the problem here. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

This edit is copied word for word from a 2015 textbook. Please stop now. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Hi Adam, I fixed the first one. I will look at the second. Thank you for editing! Julex1524 (talk) 20:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey I'll take a look at it and get back to you! --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Hi Ashley, Do you know how we put our names next to who we are going to peer review. It isn't an editable column. I would do yours if you can let me know. Julex1524 (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Hi, I think that you can add an article for yourself to review under your assigned article. --AshleyFortierUML (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Instructor Coleman any and all feed back would be appreciated, or from any classmates or Adam. My info is under heading PROPOSALS and EDITS. Thank you! Julex1524 (talk) 20:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONS and EDITS

--Julex1524 (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Political Sociology has many subtitles under it and can be explored to a fuller extent. I'd begin by breaking down each highlighted area that could use more substance. Julex1524 (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

I propose to give more detail on the definition of Political Sociology and break done the interest groups.    [Political Sociology isn't only about the organized parties that are formed in our cultures and states, but a way of thinking and asking why, how , and where do these social affects form. People may have many different points of view which opens doors for more debates, conflicts, and reflections on the patterns that form. We can review the the economic and social structures of our society and see where they meet and where they end. Politics are in all our groups being education, organizations, religion, professional and in the economic grade we live in. Each group strives to find their identification and conscious and unconsciously expresses their needs and views. Labels are placed on people due to their social being. Mass media plays a strong role in citizens having a stronger and faster way to make assumptions and opinions.]talk) 20:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

This topic was covered by the Chair of the Sociology Department at University Massachusetts Lowell. I propose to add - [Power viewed in Political Sociology in its own right signifies how society depends and distributes different needs. Education, Religion, Employment, Health Care and Housing along with the Class status are all areas that rely on the well- being of the community and state.] <Daniel Egan and Levon A. Chorbajian, Power: A Critical Reader (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005> [Persons in power positions can define what our ideals are (right or wrong) and have the resources to build upon it within individuals or groups. It can take on the form to brainwash beliefs and have the society following in respect to believing in better opportunities.] <Kate Nash, Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)>

[Social stratification groups citizens into categories based on their economic class and means of life. Being labeled can have benefits for the upper class and added problems for the lower class. Marxism <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism > points out the problems with not having the same resources and the lack of an organized approach to obtain them.] <Power and Inequality www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/deviance-social-control-and-crime-7/the-conflict-perspective-on-deviance-63/power-and-inequality-379-8673/> Julex1524 (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposal to add a link to Karl Marx's Theoretical Models in Political Sociology that stems on social class theory. <http://crab.rutgers.edu/~goertzel/polsoctheories.htm> [There is a relation between class and economy regarding our political bias and the weight it holds in voting patterns. The influence of power and what the economy has and has not to offer the citizens impacts which party they vote for. Individuals social surroundings and the resources they have to voice their needs affect political mind set.]<Siewart Lindenberg, "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in particular." Researchgate.net publication Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985>

Proposal to add definition of "Normal".<https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=normal> [Social Movement can take place in a small scale within communities or in a larger aspect as in issues with women’s equality, transgender, and gay rights. Each area can direct individual opinions by their culture, religion and social interactions. The politics look at the social order and how “normal” is stated and interpreted. ] [“Normal” is defined differently in various social orders. The old views verse the new views and the rights of citizens to organize and stand behind each organization. ] <Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power, Second Ed, Kate Nash, Wiley/Blackwell ltd, Publishing, 2010 Chapter 3:Social Movements >

Proposal: to add definition and link to social trends,http://www.trendsactive.com/#!/our-trends/societal-trends/ dynamics,

References: 1. Daniel Egan and Levon A. Chorbjian, Power: A Critical Reader(Pearson Prentice Ha..,2005) retrieved June20,2016. 2. Kate Nash, Contemporary Political Sociology: Sociology; Globalization, Politics, and Power ( Wiley-Blackwell,2010) retrieved June 20, 2016. 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/marxism retrieved June 21,2016. 4.Power and Inequality www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/deviance-social-control-and-crime-7/the-conflict-perspective-on-deviance-63/power-and-inequality-379-8673, retrieved June 21,2016. 5. Siewart Lindenberg, "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in particular." Researchgate.net publication Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985> 6. "Theoretical Models in Political Sociology," from Political Society, by Ted Goertzel,pub 1976 Rand McNally