JulieMay54

September 2016

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as JulieMay54/sandboxwaiting. But as you had created the page in what we call the "Article space", it was bound to get deleted. Your sandboxes should be maintained in your user pace and not in the article space. To that extent, I have moved the page you created to your user space. You can find it right here: User:JulieMay54/sandboxwaiting. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Lourdes 08:49, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Lourdes for your assistance. This is a draft article which I obviously put in the wrong place. Thanks for the assistance. Hopefully I can lose my training wheels soon. JulieMay54 (talk) 00:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nessa Carey

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nessa Carey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nessa Carey

The article Nessa Carey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nessa Carey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for your review of this article - it has been a valuable learning experience. JulieMay54 (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

citations

Hi JulieMay54,

I was just checking the citations on the Felicity Goodyear-Smith article and came across these references:

Goodyear-Smith, F; Arroll, B (Oct 1999). Literature review on rehabilitation after arthroscopic knee surgery for meniscal damage. Final Report to the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation. p. 46.

Goodyear-Smith, F; Arroll, B (Mar 2001). Recommendations regarding imaging and referrals with respect to acute and chronic low back pain. Report to the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation. 57p.

Goodyear-Smith, F; Halliwell, J (April 2007). Recommendations regarding efficacy of anticonvulsant drugs for neuropathic pain management: Report to the Accident Compensation Corporation. Auckland. 245 pp.

I am having trouble finding them. Can you tell if they have been published and where you found them? Thanks, -- haminoon (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello Haminoon, These are reports for the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation and, as such, appear unpublished. They are listed both in Goodyear-Smith's University of Auckland Academic CV (http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_files/roarprofile/document/9162_cv_uoa_2014.pdf) and on her personal website. I have not sighted them myself. JulieMay54 (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Nessa Carey

On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nessa Carey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the molecular biologist Nessa Carey cites the slight figure of actress Audrey Hepburn (pictured) to illustrate the possible impacts of epigenetics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nessa Carey. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nessa Carey), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Felicity Goodyear-Smith you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks User:Legobot I am currently travelling and may not always have internet but will try to respond as promptly as possible. JulieMay54 (talk) 06:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry Julie May, but I have failed the Good Article nomination. I have left a detailed explanation at the review page. If you have any questions you can ask them here or at my talk page. If you want to ask someone for a second opinion of my review I will not mind. Please don't take my comments the wrong way, I do not think your article is bad - in fact it is better than most of the articles on here - I just don't think it currently meets the GA criteria. I hope my comments have been constructive and I wish you the best in taking this article further. AIRcorn (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks User:Aircorn all useful feedback. I'm finding the GA process a valuable learning tool. I will look in detail when I'm not travelling. I found it difficult to find the right balance around the controversy so agree with what you're saying. JulieMay54 (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I used to be very involved in the GA process and agree it is great as a learning tool. You do get some variability with reviewers and I am probably a bit harder than some. If you need any help let me know and if I have time I will do what I can. AIRcorn (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

New Zealand Barnstar

		The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
		Nice work on New Zealand bios. Keep it up.
		this WikiAward was given to JulieMay54 by Schwede66 on 18:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Sandbox use, and Anthony D. Holmes

Hallo Julie, I've come across your new article Anthony D. Holmes (Medical) while working on redirects at New page patrol. Thanks for creating it, but I saw a couple of problems.

Firstly: the article title: no need for disambiguation as he's the only "Anthony D. Holmes" in the encyclopedia. If he did need disambiguation, a noun is preferable to an adjective, and capital letters aren't used except for proper nouns - so "(surgeon)" would have been better. I've moved it to Anthony D. Holmes (and created an incoming redirect from Anthony David Holmes - important, as people are sometimes linked in other articles (eg lists of award winners) with their full name.

But Secondly: more complicated... using your sandbox to create article after article and moving them to main space produces an accidental effect of a long and irrelevant history for the article. I've done it myself once in the past and realised it doesn't work well. Looking at this I can now see that everything before 10 February 2018 is irrelevant, and confusing - it looks as if the article has been around since Jan 2016 and that you've done a huge proportion of the editing since then, which flags up WP:SPA/WP:COI worries at a quick glance. I don't know whether there's a way this can be retrospectively cleaned up - pinging @Anthony Appleyard: because he knows about these things. In future it might be better to start an article as "JulieMay54/Anthony D. Holmes", ie create a subpage specific to the article, so that you can then move it into mainspace with no historical baggage. Alternatively, create an article in your sandbox but then use cut and paste to create it in mainspace - no worries about copyright, attribution etc, because it is all your own work, and the history of it being created incrementally by yourself isn't really significant and won't matter if it gets lost (would be preserved if you took the subpage route). Either way, the resulting article then has a clear and correct history.

Happy editing! PamD 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

• @PamD and JulieMay54: I have moved those old irrelevant edits of Anthony D. Holmes, to User:JulieMay54/sandbox2. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard: Thanks - I knew you'd be able to fix it! PamD 09:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard:and @PamD: Thanks for the advice. Ive never been sure how to manage clearing my sandbox to begin again. I will try your suggestion of using subpages. JulieMay54 (talk)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for all the photos you are uploading. Many of our country areas don't have a lot of photos available on Commons, so keep up the good work!

Kerry (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Kerry its so easy to take few photos as we travel around - country Australia has some fabulous places and people!JulieMay54 (talk)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JulieMay54. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Marguerite Evans-Galea) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marguerite Evans-Galea.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The career section is a bit too promotional

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC) {{Re|Rosguill}} thank for your review. Can you please give me a little more specific guidance as to what needs to change? 110.142.122.100 (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

"Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial). Since you had some involvement with the Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 09:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)