Juliusvergara

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence R. Armstrong (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence R. Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence R. Armstrong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence R. Armstrong (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence R. Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence R. Armstrong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Juliusvergara! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

John Cain (broker) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Cain (broker), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Cain (broker) (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Cain (broker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Cain (broker), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Cain (broker) (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Cain (broker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Cain (broker), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello, Juliusvergara. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

The notice above should be answered at your earliest possible convenience.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ware Malcomb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ware Malcomb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SamHolt6 (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juliusvergara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here ~~I am a beginner volunteer editor for Wikipedia. Although my contributions were from a direct request for Sinan Kanatsiz's page, I attempted to have his page reinstated back to what it was before I had edited it, as it was in good standing. For the other pages I've created, I was learning in the process. I sincerely apologize for any added disruption to the integrity of the Wikipedia platform when I made these contributions, as I was still learning as both an individual editor and as an avid Wikipedia user. I will gladly withhold any and all further contributions on Wikipedia, and I understand the position I'm in with being blocked from the platform. But I would like to explore more options in developing my skillset as a Wikipedia contributor and potentially have my account unblocked. In light of my recent actions, I humbly request that the page for Sinan Kanatsiz be reinstated back to the original format before I made any edits, as I had no prior access to make those previous updates and changes which had the page for Sinan Kanatsiz published originally. ~~

Decline reason:

Who asked you to create the Sinan Kanatsiz page? This looks like undiclosed paid editing. Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. You must disclose who asked you to edit which pages. Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sinan Kanatsiz

@Athaenara: User asks that Sinan Kanatsiz be restored as it was before he got a hold of it. I might speculate that his employer is displeased, but that's just 'cause I have a speculative mind. Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: None of the versions of Sinan Kanatsiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), which has been deleted four times (including prod, speedy delete, Afd), have been "in good standing". I got a notice that this user had sent me email: now I know what he'll be asking me. I won't take that on myself, but nor will I interfere with any other administrator who wants to be more accomodating. – Athaenara ✉ 04:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

@Juliusvergara: Now that I've read three emails you sent to me, I see a need to be very clear about an additional thing. You included a phone number and invited me to call, then asked if a call you got from some other number was me. I did not call you. I will not call you. No more emails, please. – Athaenara ✉ 08:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)