User talk:JungIn/sandbox

Welcome to my talk page!!!

suggestions from NetworkedTogether: Ruth

First of all, you have a great start on an interesting subject. This is a complex subject that is very technical. Great work so far!!!

A brief description of some concepts or topics to be explored that will expand the article. There are many areas that could be explored more fully. The court battles would be good to talk about, how the companies who want to provide content (Hulu, Netflix) would want network neutrality what the firms that provide the bandwidth (Comcast, Verizon) want to make sure that they can control access and promote their own business model. Prof. Bauer’s paper would be really good to use as a source of information.

Citations for two academic papers that they should look through. vanSchewick, B. (2010). Network Neutrality: What a Non-Discrimination Rule Should Look Like (working paper)

Donahue, H.C. (2010). “The network neutrality inquiry.” The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media

A brief description of why each of the papers noted in (b) will be helpful.

Both of these are good and discuss the issue of network neutrality. The second one takes a look at it closely and discusses the FCC aspects of the issue. 


A quote from one of the two academic research papers identified in (b) that might be of interest.

“Industrial rationalization and market administration define the US Federal Communications Commission Notice of Proposed Net Neutrality Rulemaking for broadband communications in internet industries, generally referred to as the Network Neutrality Inquiry” is a nice statement from the second article.

After conducting a search on Wikipedia Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page), post a link to a media file (image, sound, movie) that can be incorporated into each article.

Make relevant suggestions for improving grammar, “wikification,” etc. It looks very “wikified”, no suggestions from me.  :-) --NetworkedTogether (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Along with the internet service providers, i believe the example of China might be helpful where the government has complete control over the internet. The quote in this following article explain this a bit "China will surely retain control over the Internet as giving complete freedom to websites would undermine its efforts to maintain balance" . The article is found in MSU library so you might have to login http://ezproxy.msu.edu.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/463306348?accountid=12598. Umarmuha (talk) 00:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

A publishes news article AT&T Fights for Control of Its Cable Lines in Struggle Over Internet Access might be helpful because it explains that how at&t is trying to monopolize the pipe lines that provide internet through-out the country while knowing that the current pipes can provide far greater data when compared to current ones. The link to the article http://ezproxy.msu.edu.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/110134853?accountid=12598 Umarmuha (talk) 00:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

overall the article is at a good start with proper citing and reference links. Umarmuha (talk) 00:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

here is a logo that shows computers connected over the internet. This might help reader to visualize the concept in the article Internet . Umarmuha (talk) 00:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

As justification to network bias, Yoo's articles might be useful. Yoo, C.S. (2006) Network Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion. Georgetown Law Review, Vol. 94. 1947-1908 http://www.nextgenweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/yoo-network-neutrality-and-the-economics-of-congestion.pdf

"Professor Christopher Yoo draws on the economics of congestion to propose a new analytical framework for assessing such restrictions. He concludes that when transaction costs render metering network-usage uneconomical, imposing restrictions on bandwidth-intensive activities may well enhance economic welfare by preventing high-volume users from imposing uncompensated costs on low-volume users."

--Yoshi1215 (talk) 01:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Good Introduction

I like the content of your Introduction. Looks great. However, make sure to look up the wikipedia style. Look at featured articles and make sure that you have that. For example, the first sentence of your introduction typically has the title of the article in it. Get creative. The more attractive the article, the better. Chlopeck (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)