Jurianus

Your submission at Articles for creation: WeTicket (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Frost were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTicket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Frost 14:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Jurianus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Frost 14:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Frost,

Thanks a lot for checking my edit! I am learning how to use wikipedia and thought the sources were okay (given that they are all trustworthy and the cases of telegraaf en quote quite renowned journalistic media companies.

Could you specify on which of the 4 bases the sources were considered unreliable? Keen to learn and improve!

Thanks in advance! Jurianus (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

This doesn't seem reliable or independent as it publishes press releases, which means anyone can pay to be published. This seems reliable but not significant. This looks okay but doesn't seem significant either. Here's a link for more information: Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Frost 13:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

I see, fully agree with you on the first source, and thanks for the additional information. But just so i understand you correctly, a news article that says something was founded by someone is not a significant source supporting that fact? And neither is an article on an investment a good source supporting a statement about that very investment? Jurianus (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Reliable sources that are not significant can be used to support individual statements, as long as the content added accurately matches the source. The importance of significant coverage here is to establish notability for the subject to comply with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Frost 16:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WeTicket (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTicket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 16:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)