Justin Wabscott

Justin Wabscott, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Justin Wabscott! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio 3T (August 18)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only suggestive of an advertised business profile and the current information and sources are considered no differently, notability cannot be inherited either; what we consider significant instead is major reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studio 3T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Studio 3T has a new comment

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Studio 3T. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio 3T (October 7)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The largest concern I have with the draft is that the references are almost entirely "how-to" reviews or guides - there is very little in the way of content that isn't describing how to use it. As a note, stackoverflow and other "forum"-type pages are not considered to be reliable and should not be used. Being listed on a "list of the top ten XYZ that will do ABC" is okay for notability, but not great (especially when "ABC" is rather obscure). Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studio 3T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio 3T (March 5)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article still does not make it clear how the subject is notable, only that it exists and its features.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studio 3T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Studio 3T, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio 3T (April 19)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studio 3T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Studio 3T, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tony Robinson

Tony Robinson is a pioneer in the application of recurrent neural networks to speech recognition, being one of the first to discover the practical capabilities of deep neural networks and how they can be used to benefit speech recognition. He first published on the topic while studying for his PhD at Cambridge University in the 1980s.

In 1995, Robinson formed SoftSound Ltd, a speech technology company which was acquired by search pioneer Autonomy with a view to using the technology to make unstructured video and voice data easily searchable. Robinson helped build the fastest vocabulary speech recognition system available at the time, and operating in more languages than any other model, by developing and focusing on recurrent neural networks.^[1]

From 2008 – 2010, Robinson was the Director of the Advanced Speech Group at SpinVox, a provider of speech-to-text conversion services for carrier markets, including wireless, VoIP and cable. Their Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system was for a while being used more than one million times per day and SpinVox was subsequently acquired by global speech technology company Nuance.

Tony Robinson was also founder of Speechmatics which launched its cloud-based speech recognition services in 2012. Speechmatics subsequently announced a significant technological breakthrough in accelerated new language modeling late in 2017^[2]. Robinson continues to publish papers at the rapidly developing edges of speech recognition technology, especially in the area of statistical language modelling.^[3]

^ Robinson, Tony; Hochberg, Mike; Renals, Steve (1996). "The Use of Recurrent Neural Networks in Continuous Speech Recognition". Automatic Speech and Speaker Recognition. 355: 233-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1367-0_10. Retrieved 4 May 2018. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); External link in |doi= (help); More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
^ Orlowski, Andrew. "Total recog: British AI makes universal speech breakthrough". The Register. Situation Publishing. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
^ Chelba, Ciprian; Mikolov, Tomas; Schuster, Mike. "One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modeling". Arxiv.org. Cornell University Library. Retrieved 4 May 2018.

Add topic

[1] Robinson, Tony; Hochberg, Mike; Renals, Steve (1996). "The Use of Recurrent Neural Networks in Continuous Speech Recognition". Automatic Speech and Speaker Recognition. 355: 233-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1367-0_10. Retrieved 4 May 2018. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); External link in |doi= (help); More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)

[2] Orlowski, Andrew. "Total recog: British AI makes universal speech breakthrough". The Register. Situation Publishing. Retrieved 4 May 2018.

[3] Chelba, Ciprian; Mikolov, Tomas; Schuster, Mike. "One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modeling". Arxiv.org. Cornell University Library. Retrieved 4 May 2018.

[1]

[2]

[3]