Removal of templates

edit

Please do not remove templates from articles, as you did here, without addressing the issue. If you are the editor in question about the template then it is wholely inappropriate for your to remove it and it could be considered disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 18:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Justinhandgregory, you have twice removed the "undisclosed paid editing" tags from the TAV College article. Don’t do that. If you do it again you may be blocked from editing.

And don’t pretend you do not have a conflict of interest at TAV College; you obviously do. Out of the eight references you cite in that article, three of them are from the college newspaper and are actually written by you yourself, dating back to 2018.

In the three articles you have created, you are clearly writing about people or institutions who employ you or pay you in some way. That is a conflict of interest and you must disclose it. Don’t pretend to be a neutral "member of the general public writing on their own volition"; pretending will get you nowhere when your conflict is so obvious. You must disclose - must publicly admit - that you are editing from a conflict of interest standpoint if you want to continue editing here. This is Wikipedia policy. See WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for undisclosed conflict-of-interest editing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Marking edits as minor

edit

  Hi Justinhandgregory! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. . Gusfriend (talk) 01:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:McGill University School of Biomedical Sciences.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:McGill University School of Biomedical Sciences.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Abraham Boyarsky

edit

  Hello, Justinhandgregory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abraham Boyarsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply