Juwe

Welcome

Hello Juwe, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on Talk page. Again, welcome! You 00:23, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

Date wikilinks

Hi. Thanks for all your efforts on the 1988 Windies article. I wonder if you'd mind unlinking all the partial dates in your templates? The reader gains no knowledge from (say) the June 2 article, so convention is to wikilink only full dates in FAs. Cheers! --Dweller (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Will do now. Juwe (talk) 14:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Great! Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 14:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!!

Thank you very much Juwe!!!
Thanks for your message and suggestions. I'll attempt to take it into consideration and modify the pages accordingly in future.
I really appreciate the time you have taken to assist me.
Thanking you,
Yours Sincerely,
Amit Munje (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You are most welcome. I appreciate the work you have done in updating the IPL pages, including the score summaries, so efficiently.

Juwe (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi, I was going through your edits and felt that you could do with the rollback privilege. If you want that, let me know. I will enable that on your account. --soum ^talk 14:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Soum, that would be good. Juwe (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Btw, just wanted to tell you that you are doing an awesome job with the IPL-related articles. Keep it up. :) --soum ^talk 18:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. You're doing a great job too. If the groundwork is done for this IPL, then it should be much easier to deal with future editions. Juwe (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Mass Changes

I saw you undertook a mass change of DareDevils to Daredevils. If you plan on any such mass edit in the future, you might wanna consider using AWB. Let me know if you need approval. --soum ^talk 07:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Approval for AWB would be good. I don't have any immediate plans for mass editing, but it might be useful in the future. Thanks for your help in these matters. Juwe (talk) 08:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Its best not to keep any more privileges enabled on your accounnt than you are going to use. Let me know whenever you want to use it. --soum ^talk 13:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks anyway. Juwe (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:CRIC#SCOPE

Hello, Juwe.

I'm making improvements to the project main page and to the review processes. As you pointed out, the project scope doesn't say anything about templates and I'd like to add something. If you have any wordings in mind, could you please let me know? Thanks again. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 05:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi BlackJack,

I have responded to the post on your talk page.

Cheers, --Juwe (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, Juwe. I had a look at this, which you mentioned on my talk page: {{template category | description = [[Cricket]]-related templates | help = }} ...and I think it had been put in Category:Cricket templates by mistake as it should have been in the navbox category. I've moved it there. There is a similar box on the infobox category page.

I think for the most part that it is a case of ensuring that every template is in the right category but also ensuring that articles don't get into the template categories. I've just removed half a dozen articles that had template text embedded in the article rather than a template call (as a result the noinclude doesn't work). I'll keep an eye on th etemplates as I go through things and make corrections accordingly. We do need to make sure that unused or useless templates go into the junk folder.

It looks as if there are just the four distinct template types: navbox, infobox, the CR category and these Australian colour codes. If we can structure everything that is there by using these four categories I think we will be okay. It's possible that another category type or two might need to be created but I don't think the problem is half so bad as it first seemed.

Best wishes. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 18:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The 4 categories that you have suggested sound like a good start. However, I think that there probably are more than 4 different types of template around at the moment. I suppose it depends on the definitions you use, but I would say that this template: Template:Test match, while it might be classified as an "infobox", is really a different type of template altogether. Maybe it would fit into a category called (for example) "Match result templates". Regarding the Australian colour codes, this category might be OK to start with, but hopefully it will become a subcategory of "Team colour codes" in the future. I agree with having a "Junk templates" category, but I also think it would be good to have a "Miscellaneous templates" category for templates that, as yet, haven't been categorised (and future templates not yet conceived of).

Regards, Juwe (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Ashes / Non-Ashes

Juwe, the best thing to do is to create an inverted Ashes version of your non-Ashes template and use that in Ashes series articles with the non-Ashes template in non-Ashes series articles. That way, every article will contain a link to every series and the emphasis on series type will be appropriate. Regards. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 07:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. I will do that when I have a spare moment in the near future. Juwe (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

IPL Strike Rate/Economy Table Filters

Hi, I am the person who initially put these tables on that page (and had thought of those unnecessarily convoluted filters). I do agree that for bowling the filter proposed by you is better just because it is much simpler, and achieves the same thing that was intended in the first place (i.e. someone shouldn't be high on this list at the end of the tournament just by having 1 or 2 good performances). 20 overs cutoff ensures that the bowler has bowled in at least 5 matches, which seems a big enough sample to decide whether he REALLY was economical overall and not just on one bad pitch/against one bad opposition.

This, however, is not true for the batting filter if we just say that everyone over 150 runs qualifies. A single great performance (by McCullum, Symonds, Hussey etc) which might've been the result of a really good batting pitch and/or a weak bowling attack ensures that you will be high on this list even at the end of the tournament. That does not seem ideal to me.

So, in my opinion, either 150 runs is just too small a limit for this table and should be raised to maybe 200. But, probably more appropriately, we could make it something like at least 7 innings (considering that 14 matches is the minimum that every team gets to play) or maybe a combination of both (at least 5 innings and at least 150 runs, perhaps?).

Perhaps I have this stupid knack of coming up with convoluted filters when a simpler one will do the trick. If you can think of something better that will take care of this problem then please let me know about it. The problem I am speaking of is this couple-of-good-days-and-you're-top-of-the-heap nature of the 150 runs filter.

Thanks Rtyags (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Rtyags.

I suppose the fundamental problem with those 2 tables is that they require filters at all, unlike the "most runs" and "most wickets" tables, and that it is potentially better for a player to have played fewer matches. For the "batting strike rate" table, when I changed the old filter to the new one, I was essentially trying to avoid the situation of having the table consist of the fastest scoring 5 batman out of the 9 or 10 highest scoring batsmen (as well as simplifying the filter to the reader).

Your point about single performances being responsible for most of the 150 runs is a good one, although I don't like the idea of the qualification being just "at least 7 innings" as this could lead to some tailender having scored (something like) 50 runs off 22 balls over 7 innings and being at the head of the table. Maybe your idea of a combination of runs and innings is the way to go. I think "7 innings and 150 runs" might be appropriate, as "5 innings" could still easily lead to McCullum-type situations (he had 4 innings). At the moment, this combination has 26 eligible batsmen, which I think is a large enough pool, especially given that this will probably rise somewhat by the tournament end.

Finally, I don't think your filters were bad to start with. There were 2 things that made them more appropriate earlier on in the tournament:

• Much less than the full quota of matches had been played and so it would be ridiculous to have a filter that said "at least 7 innings" when each team had only played 5 matches, or "at least 150 runs" if only 3 batsmen had yet surpassed this number of runs.
• We didn't know what sort of runs totals batsmen would end up with for the tournament. I think that at the start of the tournament, I expected far more batsmen to have passed 200 runs and 300 runs by now.

So in summing up, I think that "7 innings played and 150 runs scored" is a good solution. What do you think? Juwe (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think 7 innings and 150 runs seems a good enough filter that should give desirable results even at the end of the season. And as you mentioned, we might go with a modified version of my original filters for the initial part of every season. Rtyags (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good Juwe (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I have posted this conversation on Talk:2008 Indian Premier League#Best Economy Rate (and Bating Strike Rate) Juwe (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

2008 IPL#League progression

Are the semi-finals/final listings really necessary for the League progression table? Neither will the matches award the playing teams any points nor will all the teams play in those matches. Any information that it can possibly convey will only be redundant to 2008 IPL#Knockout stage. --soum ^talk 08:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I thought it was relevant because it gives a colour-coded form guide for the entire season, otherwise the table stops right before the 3 most important matches. It is true that there will be no points, but I thought we could just put "W" and "L" there instead (and I suppose alter the 1st note to say "group match" rather than "match"). I don't think that there will be an issue with just leaving some boxes white (or grey or whatever) given that the finals section is clearly demarcated. Also, given that the competition is called the "Indian Premier League", I thought that we should label the 2 stages as "Group stage" and "Knockout stage" (or "Finals") and use "League" to refer to the entire competition (similar to the UEFA Champions League). Finally, I don't think there is anything wrong with presenting information twice in 2 different ways (as 2008 IPL#Knockout stage and 2008 IPL#League progression would), as long as it doesn't detract from the article as a whole in some way (eg by weighing it down in unnecessary detail). I personally don't think it does that as I don't think a reader would get any more bogged doen in the expanded table than the old one, but maybe you disagree?

Juwe (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't judging right or wrong. Just whether it was really necessary. --soum ^talk 11:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Sure - and anyway, it is fine for you to say something looks bad if that is what you think. I won't take offence and am willing to change my opinion if a good argument is presented. I wasn't trying to be defensive either, just explaining why I made the change in the first place. Juwe (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

AWB Approval

 Done --soum ^talk 18:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Juwe (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Want to join?

Hello Juwe! I noticed that you contribute to cricket related articles. We are a "WikiProject" aiming to expand, improve and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. We would like to invite you to join us. If you would like to help but don't know what to do, please see our project page or inquire on our talk page. You may sign up for the project on our members list. Happy editing!

Best wishes. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 19:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

 Done Juwe (talk) 02:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Requesting comments

Could you please comment on Talk:2009 Indian Premier League#You Sure, Talk:Indian Premier League/Archive 1#The trophy and Talk:2008 Indian Premier League#Aiming for an FA (soliciting opinion on how to proceed)? --soum ^talk 07:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done Juwe (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

2009 IPL

It seems like the issue has been resolved. Do you still need me to intervene? --soum ^talk 07:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this issue I don't think so. However, it was very annoying (and wasted much time) when LeaveSleaves just tried to avoid the arguments I put forward and stuck to his position no matter what. I think he needs someone to have a word to him about actually reading, taking note of and debating the arguments put forward in discussions, and using a bit of common sense rather than scrambling for technicalities and rushing into AfD nominations. He might take it as an insult if someone tries to correct him, which he shouldn't. We all make mistakes and bad edits, and if they are pointed out we should just accept them and move on. This is not the first time I have had a problem with LeaveSleaves either, and I posted about the issue on WT:CRIC#Article for Deletion: 2009 Indian Premier League (with a link about the previous disagreement). If you put him on notice in some way (I'm not sure how exactly) that he should be cease employing unconstructive debating techniques, that would hopefully have some positive impact. Thanks Juwe (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey Juwe. Calm down, man! You will come along a lot of headstrong editors in the course of editing in Wikipedia. And that can be a very frustrating experience - so frustrating at times that it will make you not want to return to active editing ever again - but thats an occupational hazard that comes with being an Wikipedia editor, and almost everyone here has had to face it at some point or the other. Mediation is not going to be of much help here. Mediation can only help with resolving individual disputes, not make an editor change his editing habits. Particularly when he isn't uncivil or rude or disrespectful to other editors in the course of the discussion. Let's assume that he is warned but still continues, what then? There isn't a technical reason to block him from editing. So if he requests an unblock (which is handled by an admin other than the blocking admin), he is almost sure to overturn the block. The only thing that will work here is a community ban, which is a consensus reached by admins to disallow certain actions of certain editors. The first step to that is a call for an RFC. You could initiate an RFC against him. But I would not suggest you do it right now. There has been just two instances you say, and the community will be more inclined to wait and watch for the time being. Instead, I suggest you politely write him a note you (as a co-editor) find an impediment to the goal of collaborative editing, and request if he could keep that in mind for subsequent discussions. I will keep an eye on how it foes and jump in as necessary. --soum ^talk 01:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

It is a bit of a tricky problem, considering that he appears to genuinely believe he has done nothing wrong and does make various constructive edits to wikipedia. I also admit that he tries to remain civil in discourse, even if refusing to address the issues raised by another party is in fact uncivil. I don't even seek to have him blocked, I just want him to know he can't get away with grossly wasting other people's time with unacceptable conduct in discussions etc. I have actually already left a post (as yet unreplied to) on the talk page of an admin who appears to commonly deal with dispute resolution (see here User talk:PhilKnight#Recurring problems with an unconstructive editor). I am not too convinced about writing him any notes either, as he failed to engage with me constructively at the best of times and was especially recalcitrant when I made any negative remarks about his conduct. Maybe, like you suggest, I have jumped the gun a bit, but I can just see many more wasted hours occurring if someone, other than myself, doesn't put him on notice. Juwe (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

From the "For What It's Worth Department"...all box scores for American Major League Baseball list the home team second, as do ALL the other professional and semi-professional teams. I'm not sure what the historic connection is between the two (Cricket/Baseball) but I know there is one. The Home team may also be bold or in italics or with an H but even then, the Home team is always shown under the Visiting team. It's the standard way.--Buster7 (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buster7 (talk • contribs)

Hi Buster7,

I appreciate your information about baseball scores, and I realise that to non-cricket-fans the listing of the batting order might not seem that important. However, cricket differs from baseball in some important ways. I will just give you a brief and simplistic explanation of what I mean. In a cricket match, teams will bat for either one innings each (in cricket innings is singular as well as plural) or two innings each, contrasting with baseball's 9 innings per side matches. Batting innings are generally very long as well, as it is difficult to get batsmen out and an innings finishes only when the entire team of 11 has batted (and 10 of them have got out). A typical innings might see 250-300 runs scored. Thus, for a one innings per side match, you have a team that spends the first half of the match "setting a target", and the second half "defending the target" while the other team tries to "chase it down". The tactics batting first and batting second vary greatly, and the tactics of the chasing side will vary depending on the size of the target. One factor that exists in cricket, but not baseball, is that there is often a limit to the number of balls ("balls being bowled" is equivalent to "pitches being pitched") a batting team can face. Thus, teams will want to score as quickly as possible, but also ensure that they don't lose all their wickets (ie, use up all their 10 outs) too quickly. What "fast scoring" and "losing wickets too quickly" mean depends entirely on the context of the match, and in particular on the team batting order. I imagine that in baseball, due to the relative low-scoring, the fact that a significant scoring play may occur at any time (eg a 3-run homer), and that there are many innings per side, the batting order is considerably less important to match tactics. In addition, when balls are bowled, they will land on the playing surface in front of the batsman before reaching him, and the characteristics of this surface affect how easy the ball is to play. During a match, the characteristics of this surface will change in various ways, generally, but not always, making batting more difficult later on.

These are some of the reasons why it is important to list teams by batting order in a match. It is also the standard way of presenting cricket scores, not just on wikipedia, but generally too. This is why I initially changed the score summaries of the particular wikipedia page to display teams in order of batting order. I was not even aware of the wikipedia consensus at the time, but it seemed like the logical thing to do. Only afterwards did I discover that there was a strong wikipedia consensus on the issue, and it supported my format. I included the "(H)" symbol to preserve the home team information, which would otherwise have been lost by my edits. The "(H)" would not be appropriate in all circumstances though, as, for most series between international teams, matches will only occur in one coutry, and so adding an "(H)" would just look silly and unnecessary.

Juwe (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Motorsport in 2009

There is a discussion about a template you created taking place at ‎Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport‎, which you may like to take part in. --Falcadore (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

IPL Team Colours

Hi Juwe, I was just wondering about your team colours for the IPL. I like them, but I can't find them anywhere else. I see they're self-made, but did you invent them yourself? RatnimSnave (talk) 15:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi RatnimSnave, I actually got the idea for them from seeing Template:Leagueicon, which is being used for rugby league teams around the world. I saw that these .svg files had been created by using the program Inkscape. Basically, I downloaded inkscape and imitated the design of the leagueicon pictures, using the colours of the various IPL teams. Juwe (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

It's a great idea and I think it works well. I'm surprised there isn't some equivilant in the official productions by IPL. RatnimSnave (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RoyalChallengersBangalore.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RoyalChallengersBangalore.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tuples in association football. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You removed a referenced section on the sextuple. Please do not remove referenced sections, it is clearly sourced with a reliable (FIFA) source. What you feel constitute a sextuple does not matter, only sources does. Sandman888 (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

This warning is unhelpful due to its multiple inaccuracies. I provided an edit summary, I left a message on the talk page and the material I removed was totally unreferenced. The text that is now there was not the text that was there when I edited the page. Please be more careful in future.Juwe (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh my apologies then. It's because people often remove it for the reason you mentioned and it's a bit frustrating when it is referenced. Sandman888 (talk) 20:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

No problemJuwe (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Half flag color box

Template:Half flag color box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 23:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Royal Challengers Bangalore colours 2008.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Royal Challengers Bangalore colours 2008.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:International cricket seasons

Template:International cricket seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Jack | ^{talk page} 15:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates CAF

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates CAF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1985–86

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1985–86 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates France 1985–86

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates France 1985–86 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates France 1986–87

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates France 1986–87 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1986–87

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1986–87 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Italy 2006–07

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Italy 2006–07 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Tunisia

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Tunisia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Switzerland 2007–08

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Switzerland 2007–08 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 1994

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 1994 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 1997

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 1997 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2000

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2001

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2001 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2004

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2004 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2003

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Sweden 2003 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Albania

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Albania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Bolivia

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Bolivia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Cameroon

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Cameroon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates CONCACAF

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates CONCACAF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates England 1988–89

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates England 1988–89 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates England 1992–93

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates England 1992–93 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1988–89

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1988–89 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1992–93

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1992–93 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1994

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1994 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:42, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates France 1994–95

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates France 1994–95 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 2001

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 2001 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 1997

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 1997 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates 2000

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates 2000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates UEFA 2002–03

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates UEFA 2002–03 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates UEFA 2005–06

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates UEFA 2005–06 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Norway 2007

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Norway 2007 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fb competition templates Lithuania

A tag has been placed on Category:Fb competition templates Lithuania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cr-IPL

Template:Cr-IPL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC)