User talk:JzG/Archive 214
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JzG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 210 | ← | Archive 212 | Archive 213 | Archive 214 | Archive 215 | Archive 216 | → | Archive 218 |
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thanks for creating this page, for taking the time to express so eloquently what many of us think (mistakenly!) that needs no explanation. It shouldn't need it. But it does. WikiUser70176 (talk) 12:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
Possible WP:FORUMing
Respectfully, I think we are possibly heading into WP:FORUM here, which as a well respected and established admin sets a bad example and invites more such commentary. Further, I think it is always a mistake to think that opposing sides are in no way counterparts to each other. Opponents don't have to be devoid of any merit (even from their own perspective?) and be utterly asymmetrically opposed to be wrong. Taken to its extreme, "false equivalency" arguments verge on denying analogy altogether and often draw on beliefs one would typically fault "regressives" for, like objective morality, which I would class as sloppy or lazy thinking. Cheers. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
About an old discussion
Hi JzG! So I had once found suggestions that you had made back in 2019 at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281 § Indian fake media. Since then there have been two discussions (1 and 2), one AfD and an RfC related to this. Revisiting this, I don't think the RfC was ever properly implemented and the suggestions you had proposed before were likely a much better way. However I'm unsure how to go about it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Watergate scandal
Template:Editnotices/Page/Watergate scandal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Interstellarity (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Blacklisted URL
Template:Blacklisted URL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Removing the AP2 sanction on top of the Watergate scandal page
Hi JzG, on the Watergate scandal page, I was wondering if you could consider removing the contentious topic notice that you put on that page. The sanctions were narrowed down to post-1992 US politics and the recent edits of the article have shown that the only nonconstructive edits seem to be simple vandalism and content removal, which can be covered by normal policy. Interstellarity (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am sure a passing admin will happily help if you can't do this yourself, as you say it's no longer relevant. Guy (help! - typo?) 22:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hockey stick controversy
Hi Guy, it was a while ago now but as as the initiator of [[this AFD, I thought I'd let you know that I restored the article/talk edits for attribution purposes; see the talk page. I imagine you'd find the paper that inspired these actions, "Rule Ambiguity, Institutional Clashes, and Population Loss: How Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet" fascinating ... it's more or less about how Wikipedia gradually adopted a scientific point of view. We haven't crossed paths in that area much but I'd say your one of the main "non-fringe" editors who helped with this process, and Wikipedia (and the Internet) is very much the better for that. Graham87 10:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! Great article. Wikipedia-as-Usenet, basically: new Shiny Things appeared, and the dwindling band of those of us who care, hang around and try to keep the old place clean :-) Guy (help! - typo?) 20:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:JZG" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Wikipedia:JZG has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 4 § Wikipedia:JZG until a consensus is reached. Q𝟤𝟪 10:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Essay critique
I have created a new essay and would welcome some critique on the talk page there:
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
"Jesus ain't say that" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Jesus ain't say that has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 7 § Jesus ain't say that until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Since you do a lot of citation work...
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-08-01/In focus
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-08-01/Tips and tricks
These pieces might interest you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
G11ed article
Hi, I'm writing an article on Leon Redler (draft here). The article was previously speedily deleted under G11 in 2018 (by you) and A7 in 2010, and I was wondering if there was anything in the deleted versions that may be salvageable. :3 F4U (they/it) 14:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, nevermind! It appears you no longer have sysop status, I'll find someone else and sorry for the bother :3 F4U (they/it) 15:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Since you do (did?) a lot of citation work...
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-08-01/In focus
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-08-01/Tips and tricks
These pieces might interest you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Unblock reviewed
Template:Unblock reviewed has been nominated for merging with Template:Unblock. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 19:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Unusable source
Template:Unusable source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Suggestion
To avoid calls of "malformed RFC", or whatnot:
At the very top, just below the bot syntax, add a single neutral statement of what this is about, and add your signature.
I hope this helps. - jc37 00:31, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
AE discussion
Just in case pings weren't working, I wanted to give you a heads up that the AE discussion has been opened dealing with some of the comments about you. KoA (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Arb Case
Hi Guy, just wanted to let you know the AE case regarding Leyo with comments involving you has been passed on to ArbCom: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Leyo. Thanks. KoA (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect at centimeter fully protected since 2006?
Looks like you fully protected this redirect due an edit war 17 years ago. Is it good to roam now? jp×g 03:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- In as much as I remember, it was a lame war about moving the unit that Americans don't use to the American spelling thereof, but it was all a long time ago. Guy (help! - typo?) 13:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bradley Yohn (November 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bradley Yohn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, JzG!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 16:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
|