User talk:JzG/Archive 92
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:JzG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 85 | ← | Archive 90 | Archive 91 | Archive 92 | Archive 93 | Archive 94 | Archive 95 |
Levelor
- Levelor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
This user, whom you blocked indef five years ago, now wants to come back. Since the editors he was feuding with have left, I think it's worth considering. Could you take a look? Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- See user talk:Levelor. I am happy for him to be unblocked on condition that he does not mention the subject for the attack article on whom he was blocked. Obviously a low bar to re-blocking if he picks up against some other minor functionary against whom he has a grudge. Guy (Help!) 19:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Your thoughts on Telenor
Interested in your opinion here. -- Stylecustom (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Alliance of British Drivers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not assert notability. Very small group with no reliable sources to indicate notability either.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 13:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Thiyya
Just wanted to give you a heads-up that I moved an article about the Thiyya from AFC over a redirect that was at that page. Evidently there was some POV pushing and controversy back in 2007? Anyway, it seemed like a reasonable request to me, but if there’s something wrong with it I have no objections to it being sent to AFD or anywhere else. I'm just clearing out the AFC old backlog; I have no dog in the fight. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 23:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)