User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 5
It was a mistake, infact my browser stuck and gave me an error, so uploaded it as a new one. Rajeshbieee (talk) 10:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello sir, why did you erased the details of this film songs inspired film titles, did you felt it was unnecessary for the legacy section or did u removed since it lacked citations. Sir, if you see the wiki page of Hindi film Karz, see the influence section which is given that the songs from the film has inspired film titles. Even in tamil films, titles of few films were named after many hit songs. I just wanted to note that point. Do u feel is it wrong ?
Straw Poll
editThere is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.
The straw poll is at Template talk:Infobox person#Straw poll.
AfD is not the correct venue for file deletions, so I have closed the discussion. As this is an unused non-free image, it will be deleted after 7 days, which will be on 11 December. You don't need to do anything now to get this deleted. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Michig: And I do not want bots reminding me of such files, so I tried having it deleted myself. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I am very Happy
editYou know my list has passed FL. This was the first list, I ever started working on for FL promotion. I worked so hard in 2013 that some users actually complemented me for my work and they said it would be a featured list one day and look it has become one. I can't believe it. Previously, there were not much sources but, @Krimuk90: told me to dig deeper for sources and I got all the sources. Now, I feel like I can do much better here and that too without knowing proper english. And, thank you for participating in the review and making it better through your inputs.—Prashant 07:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
You saw what Krimuk90 did? I mean I thanked him but, he didn't accepted. Anyway, at least I tried.—Prashant 08:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi
editHey if you would like to call that an attack most welcome buddy. But after putting me through and sockpuppetry I thought I need to speak and I'm sure I have my right for speech. Thanks. Daan0001 (talk) 19:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Your claims are true, and Krimuk lost the SPI case. But he would have reverted your comment anyway; he rejected a barnstar from your friend, so why would he accept a hate message from you? Kailash29792 (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- I do not mind the revert. That's the least thing I would. Plus I don't even know Prashant we just had couple of conversation while working on wiki articles mate. Tell your friend to mind his/her business rather dragging me in. Anyway, peace. Daan0001 (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Kailash, that's not an attack. I'd advise you not to revert such edits as you'll end up in trouble sometimes. Cheers —Vensatry (ping) 20:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The SPI is not a game to lose. Grow up Daan! --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I know it's not game lol. That's why I would do my home work before I report users. But for you it is. Every time you try to trap other good users on SPI cause of your jealousy. Krim u GROW UP!. Daan0001 (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Jealous of what? His broken English? Or the fact that everyone makes fun of him? LOL! And only someone as useless as you can think of him as a "good" user. Hilarious! --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I know it's not game lol. That's why I would do my home work before I report users. But for you it is. Every time you try to trap other good users on SPI cause of your jealousy. Krim u GROW UP!. Daan0001 (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- The SPI is not a game to lose. Grow up Daan! --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Kailash, that's not an attack. I'd advise you not to revert such edits as you'll end up in trouble sometimes. Cheers —Vensatry (ping) 20:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Eveyone makes fun out of him ? Bullying I guess ... Good I will save this for future. Thanks Jealous Kream. Daan0001 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- LMAO! I can give you some of my "cream" to save as well. Hahahahahaha. You are hilarious. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Daan0001, now this is what I call an attack. You may support Prashant if you want as he is your good friend. But please refrain from commenting on Krimuk's behaviour/edits for god's sake. —Vensatry (ping) 07:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Am I getting confused here ? When did I comment on Krim edits? It was Krim comment on Prashants work ? Daan0001 (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure about your understanding. But I can assure you that I haven't confused you. I was pointing out you saying that Krimuk is jealous over Prashant. Why do you think so? —Vensatry (ping) 13:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Enough! This is my talkpage, not a battlefield! Ok Vensatry and Krimuk your comments were valid, but not the way a less experienced user fights two veterans. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure about your understanding. But I can assure you that I haven't confused you. I was pointing out you saying that Krimuk is jealous over Prashant. Why do you think so? —Vensatry (ping) 13:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Am I getting confused here ? When did I comment on Krim edits? It was Krim comment on Prashants work ? Daan0001 (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Daan0001, now this is what I call an attack. You may support Prashant if you want as he is your good friend. But please refrain from commenting on Krimuk's behaviour/edits for god's sake. —Vensatry (ping) 07:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- LMAO! I can give you some of my "cream" to save as well. Hahahahahaha. You are hilarious. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I do not mind the revert. That's the least thing I would. Plus I don't even know Prashant we just had couple of conversation while working on wiki articles mate. Tell your friend to mind his/her business rather dragging me in. Anyway, peace. Daan0001 (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Of course, it's your talk page. But did you understand the root cause of this discussion? —Vensatry (ping) 14:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Poor fellow you are. A revert turned you talk page into a bloody cockfight. Anyways, don't loose your temper Kailash, it may turn into something more worst. Take care. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Haider (film)
editThanks for your views. I would repeat. Remember one thing, when it comes to Haider (film) article I'll forever be the major contributor to it because I have given my heart and soul to expand it the way it was just before this edit. Entire thing. Yes. Entire. I mean it, I swear. Read its page statistics or my edit statistics. I know it and Allah knows it. I feel ashamed to say all this in such a way but the circumstances created force me to write this. User Krimuk90 is really hates me. Not only on Haider but on O Kadhal Kanmani, my edits were reverted. Arjann (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- You will be credited as the major contributor. But please remind Krimuk that he can improve upon the prose written by you, rather than delete content added by you. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- If I did delete his contributions, which I did not, then how could he have written the whole thing? That's the catch-22 situation. Arjann, please think before you accuse other editors of holding a vendetta against you. I did revert you once or twice, when you refused to accept my grammatically correct version of the lead, and were adamant on retaining the poorly written one. Other than that, I do not have the time or the energy to "hate" you. I have far better things to do in life than hating on people I don't even know. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I won't edit anything hereafter. It is bitter truth that @Krimuk90: wants to own articles. That's it. Especially films that are hit or have a widespread acclaim. He feels jealous that he couldn't do it and some other user has done it. He can't digest that fact. I know your intuitions Krimuk90. By the way, when did you upload Shahid Kapoor's image in Wikimedia Commons? Very long back right? For what reasons? Because you had planned months ago for accomplishing this motive. I told you sweetheart, I'm very observant. Arjann (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- If I did delete his contributions, which I did not, then how could he have written the whole thing? That's the catch-22 situation. Arjann, please think before you accuse other editors of holding a vendetta against you. I did revert you once or twice, when you refused to accept my grammatically correct version of the lead, and were adamant on retaining the poorly written one. Other than that, I do not have the time or the energy to "hate" you. I have far better things to do in life than hating on people I don't even know. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)