Kalligrafiemonk

Welcome!

Hello, Kalligrafiemonk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Babylonokia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Likewise! Interesting subject for an article, I enjoyed reading up on it. --McGeddon (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help and encouragement!--kalligrafiemonk

Babylonokia photo

Good to see a photo here, but do you have Karl Weingärtner's express permission to release it under a CC-licence attribution-commercial licence? (This means that anyone can reuse the photo in any context, even a commercial one, without paying Weingärtner royalties, which he may not be happy with.) --McGeddon (talk) 10:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Please could you change this for me,that everyone who use this Photo have to quote me as source.

--kalligrafiemonk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.120.60.190 (talk) 10:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

That's what you've got at the moment; that it's your "own work" and anyone can reuse it with attribution (naming you as the photographer of the image). But did you take the photo, or is it Weingärtner's? --McGeddon (talk) 10:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

I am Karl Weingärtner --kalligrafiemonk

Thanks for clarifying. Given that the article has a quote rightly complaining about the photo being used "without my knowledge and without my consent" in the press, I'd like to get this 100% verified, just in case there's been any slight breakdown in communication here. Can you visit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Babylonokia.jpg and follow the instructions to confirm that you, Karl Weingärtner, are happy for anyone in the world to reuse this photo for any purpose (even in newspapers, etc) without paying you anything for the usage? Either send an email, or put something on your official website confirming that you're releasing this photo as CC-Attribution-Commercial. Thanks! --McGeddon (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

I have already taken the photo from my website. --kalligrafiemonk

I raise objections to the deletion of my photo Babylonokia.jpg. My copyright for this photo and my identity is confirmed on this website of the Austrian Post: https://www.post.at/sammelboerse/go/marke_detail/id/ab3777a4002cf809c0a2acea715d9c48 Kalligrafiemonk (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)kalligrafiemonk

Not sure what you mean there. We need either an email from Karl Weingärtner confirming the CC licencing, or a message on Karl Weingärtner's website to that effect. Can you provide either of those? --McGeddon (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I already sent an email confirming the CC licencing January the 19th and 26th 2017 to permission-commons.[Ticket#2017011910015531] [Ticket#2017012610011898]--kalligrafiemonk

Now I sent following email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org:

I hereby affirm that I Karl Weingärtner the creator and owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work "Babylonokia.jpg" as shown here: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonokia and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonokia and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Karl Weingärtner

Date, 1.02.2107 [Ticket#2017020110018499] --kalligrafiemonk

I raise objections to the deletion of my photo Babylonokia.jpg. My copyright for this photo and my identity is confirmed on this website of the Austrian Post: https://www.post.at/sammelboerse/go/marke_detail/id/ab3777a4002cf809c0a2acea715d9c48 Kalligrafiemonk (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Kalligrafiemonk

Hello again. You should be fine to just re-upload the image to Commons, and fill in the appropriate details (including the fact that you submitted a permission email earlier in the month) when you do so. (The identity concerns are whether you, User:Kalligrafiemonk, are Karl Weingärtner, not whether Karl Weingärtner did or did not create the artwork, and the email you sent should have cleared that up.) --McGeddon (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mondsee fragments has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mondsee fragments. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mondsee fragments (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mondsee fragments and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 08:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Kalligrafiemonk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 08:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mondsee fragments

Hello, Kalligrafiemonk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mondsee fragments, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

delete it Kalligrafiemonk (talk) 06:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)