Kanejon

Welcome!

Hello, Kanejon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Janet E. Mertz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Janet E. Mertz. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janet E. Mertz (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Janet E. Mertz may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Kanejon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Text

I've posted the deleted text here, minus the copyright material. You should avoid referencing yourself, you are not a independent verifiable sources for yourself. You shouldn't need more than a couple of citations for any fact, you don't need everything you can find. Let me know if you need help and remember you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Wedding3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wedding3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

To add to the bot notice: the filename suggests that this is a photograph from a wedding, and it looks professionally lit (offset fill-flash highlight visible in subject's eyes). Can you confirm that you are the photographer who shot the photo? Because if not, we need explicit confirmation from the actual photographer that it can be released in this way. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Sock-puppet

Exponentially girthy sock-puppet of Daniel Kane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7996:B900:DCC:D22C:63C2:7986 (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)