Karadirosa

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rene di Rosa (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rene di Rosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 04:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Karadirosa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 04:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

External links inside article text

Hello, Karadirosa. As promised, here are some comments about including external links to the di Rosa gallery in the articles on various artists. Whether or not these are appropriate additions is a question for the editors who normally work on each of those pages. But there is no question about the form in which these additions should be made. With only rare exceptions (and this isn't one of them), we do not place external links inside the body of an article. The acceptable approach is to put the name of the gallery in the article, and then add the link as part of a footnote using the {{cite web}} template. I've done this at the article on David Best (sculptor). But you made similar additions to a good many more such articles and it would be helpful if you were to correct those other articles yourself. Two points -- you might find (as I did at the David Best article) that some other editor made the same mistake. You are under no obligation to correct someone else's mistake, but be aware that it was a mistake. Second, regarding the access-date parameter in the template, it is good practice to use whatever date format is already being used in the article (i.e., November 3, 2016 vs 2016-11-03). If there is already inconsistency in the article, then just choose the one that you prefer. I hope all of this was helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for clarifying - that is very helpful and I will fix those references on artist pages. However, my original inquiry was regarding the rejecting of the article I am hoping to create about Rene di Rosa (person), which I thought (I suppose that is the keyword) was very well supported. --Karadirosa (talk) 19:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rene di Rosa has been accepted

Rene di Rosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Karadirosa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Rene di Rosa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Also possible COI to anything related to di Rosa, such as Paul Kos. Jooojay (talk) 02:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)