User talk:KarinaD311/Ahanta language
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chuck Haberl in topic Final Review
Bibliography
editHi Karina, this is a good start but you'll need some decent references. Please consult the rubric for the assignment for an idea of what is acceptable and what is not. Also, you should check Glottolog and Google Scholar; there are lots of great references on Glottolog (https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/ahan1243). Chuck Haberl (talk) 23:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Final Review
editHi Karina, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:
- Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar, although the language is at times unencyclopedic. 5 points.
- Structure: The structure is a bit idiosyncratic and could benefit from revisions. 4 points.
- Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
- Accuracy: It is difficult to gauge the accuracy of many claims, because none of them are furnished with citations. Only three of the references in the bibliography are scholarly, but it is not immediately clear which claims derive from them. 1 point.
- Relevance: Not all of information is relevant, but most of the page concerns the language and its speakers. 5 points.
- Length: Word count 1210/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 3 points.
The final score is 23/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)