User talk:Kasper2006/Archive2

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jackie Joyner-Kersee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Athletics

Silvano Simeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Coach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Italian Athletics

No problem, but why to create a standard only for italian athletes? Ok for starting from zero, just let's collect some other user in order to have a critical mass. Maybe it's a good idea to communicate with the project:Athletics, it isn't? I am always oriented to work into an organized group. --Pigr8 ^{Melius esse quam videri} 16:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Featured portals

You cannot single-handedly promote a portal to featured status (in your case Portal:Athletics) without first going through the nomination process. Therefore, I reverted all of your changes with regards to featured portals. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

While you can directly bypass portal peer review, this venue is better for receiving feedback as opposed to the nomination process. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I see that it requires update each month, correct? The ongoing trend for portals is to set up automatic rotation. Take a look at the most recently promoted portal, Portal:Arts. Every time you click the "purge" button, it loads new contents from a pre-determined list. This way it reduces the amount of time spend on maintenance as well as visitors seeing new contents all the time. It also helps stopping "dash and go" nominations (i.e. get the portal promoted, then halt maintaining the portal once it gained featured status). OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure, but you'll need more biographies and articles. Aim for no less than 20 each (probably more since your area is broad and sufficient featured/good articles to bring the total beyond 20 each). And you should also aim for some pictures (again, about 20, featured pictures if possible). OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Wait for some feedback first before nominating at featured portals candidate. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:59, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I was in Iceland until yesterday. I see that it's now on Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Athletics so let's wait and see what happens. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 01:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Atleti italiani

Ciao Kasper, capito così raramente su en.wiki che mi sono accorto solo ora dei messaggi. Che dire? Mi sembra che stai facendo un ottimo lavoro, complimenti. Io sinceramente non riuscirei ad essere attivo anche qui su en.wiki, per ora il tempo che ho a disposizione lo tengo buono per il progetto su it.wiki :) --Dre Rock (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Grazie =D --Erik1991 (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Ma sulla wikipedia in lingua italiana ci siamo mai incontrati ? --Erik1991 (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Tiki Gelana

Article is a stub. No doubt about it. It is three sentences and you know nothing about her except TWO races. In football, rugby, cricket and every other sport it is a stub. Seeing how you originally had it at a C shows you have some ways to go before correctly identifying between stub and a C. Often times it is a judgement call between classes, but this is not even close.

She rates low. Nowhere in the article does it mention she ran the 4th fastest time. Only mentions TWO races. Also, you have to remember all the runners that have gone before. It is often not about a record, but also celebrity. Been at this a long time and this is clear cut based upon what is in the article. Heck, I don't even know if she ran an Ethiopian record or Dutch record. Bgwhite (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok. But what about this? ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Um, not sure what you are thinking. But, the link you gave is for portals and not articles. Bgwhite (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Italy at the Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Italian and Swimming

Claudia Testoni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rivalry

Silvano Chesani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lodi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2012 (UTC)77

Sailing Class World Championships

I noticed you have taken the World Championships of a number of the classes page. I spent quite a bit of time populating these and would prefer them not to be on individual pages. They will not be maintained if they are away from the class page. I think having things in three places on wikipedia isn't a good idea and please search before doing this kind of page change. You can also find this unmaintaned list of saiing World Championships List_of_World_Championships_medalists_in_sailing which I have slowly been updating and moving onto the class pages. I suspect there are in excess of 100 sailing world titles a year as a guess surely we don;t need that many additional pages. I would be interested in your thoughts? (User talk:Yachty4000) 22:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Meanwhile, thanks for your previous job. I think that at least for the eight Olympic classes is necessary to have an article (four of the eight already existed). I have also seen the pages updated by inserting the winners of the last three editions and the list of multiple medalists. It is not my intention to create items for other sailing classes. So I would say leave things as they are, in any case is never convenient to have pages too long. Otherwise we can discuss it in the Community Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sailing. And now, whats your opinion on this request? --Kasper2006 (talk) 02:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure about this bearing inmind if you look at the old Olympic Classes like the Dragon (keelboat) and Flying Dutchman (dinghy) you will notice they don't have there own page and contain far more information. My own view is I would rather have a slightly longer page that is maintained than the data in lots of places. That old Sailing World Champion page is an example of this and probably something you hadn't even noticed I didn't until after about a year of editing sailing content. On a minor note it is a World Championship without the "s" because your showing one title. This brings me on to my next concern the Finn also has a Junior Worlds and a Masters Worlds so your medal table is actually wrong Lawrence Lemieux from Canada I believe has won 5 masters title but I would need to check the Laser has even more titles! I would be interested in your thoughts? (User talk:Yachty4000) 10:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Meanwhile, thanks for your previous job. I think that at least for the eight Olympic classes is necessary to have an article (four of the eight already existed). I have also seen the pages updated by inserting the winners of the last three editions and the list of multiple medalists. It is not my intention to create items for other sailing classes. So I would say leave things as they are, in any case is never convenient to have pages too long. Otherwise we can discuss it in the Community Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sailing. And now, whats your opinion on this request? --Kasper2006 (talk) 02:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

For the Wikipedia:Article size, I consulted an admin and he told me that, in fact a list of more than 40bn is already considered long (now her we have 82kb, before my spin-off 117kb !!). For example, I think that an article like Laser World Championships it's ok, because: 1) Is an olympic class and it needs a single page; 2) From 1974 the WC was held in many different place; 3) It's important to have a specif section" multiple medalist" for the class; 4) the actegorizzation and the links to the templates it's important; 4) We can descripe specific references and external links. I agree with you that there is no need to create all the entries of the others world championships, we can stop here. You can see the main here. For the rest, I'm happy to collaborate with you. ;) --Kasper2006 (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I posted about the Eliott 6m talk page. I still think having this on the class page is the best place. The complete list was created by someone who thought sailing was like every other sport. It is I believe the only one with 100s of World Champions each year. I also notice you ave created the Laser 4.7 as a seperate class please can we stop and think about this. Maybe we could take this conversation over to the wiki sailing project for other to discuss. I am not a fan of creating lots of new pages using other peoples contributions. User:Yachty4000 22:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I have raised this on the wiki sailing project talk page. Your comments there would be gratefully appreciated. Things like file size can be addressed. Kind Regards Yachty4000

Sergio Ottolina

You need to be more careful on how you assess the articles you create. The Ottolina was not a C class and mid importance.

To give you a better example, Mary Decker is rated a start class, but could be a C. Ben Johnson (sprinter) is a C class. They have much more info than the pages you have created. Ottolina is of low importance. Never won the Olympics, Internal even or a did a world record. When you rate for WP Italy, you have to judge against all the Italian articles and topic. When you rate for WP Biography, you have to rate against all the sports people. Also, you have to rate with what the article gives you and not what isn't written.

Oh, people think I'm always stalking them. I'm not, I just look at all the new biography articles that come in every day. Bgwhite (talk) 06:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

3 sentences and a few meets is a stub. That is very basic information. You need a few paragraphs and more meets to go upto a start. There are football articles with alot more information that are stubs. Ed Eyestone is a classic example of start. Ottolina isn't close to a stub. Bgwhite (talk) 08:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Laser Radial World Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Perth

World championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salvador Gómez

Zofia Klepacka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Polans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Lee Korzits

Um, the article is very incoherent. For example, you list the athlete as a he and she. Haven't a clue what this sentence means, "back in 2011 to win, but after eight years of the first, his second world title" fyi... it is also a stub. Bgwhite (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

There still are some "he" in the article. Also, you didn't fix the incoherent of the sentences. I took a look at your user page and it looks like English is a second language for you. English is my native language, but lets just say there is a reason I went into the sciences. Is this article a translation of another one? If so, could I take a look?

Pretty much everywhere, a 3-4 sentence article is a stub. Bgwhite (talk) 07:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Gabrio Zandonà

I think you are going to get sick of me. My wife makes me miserable, so I guess I have to make somebody miserable too. :)

This is minor and you probably weren't aware of it. On talk pages, add "blp=yes" as a parameter on WikiProjectBannerShell, if the person is living. Putting "living=yes" in WP Biography puts a little notice at top about the person being alive. If a BannerShell is added, the notice at top won't be added unless "blp=yes".

On listas and deafaultsort, only use the standard 26-letter latin alphabet. The sort algorithm doesn't use letters with diacritics or accents properly. So, Zandonà should be "Zandona". Thank you for putting it as a stub.

After seven years, I still don't know about half of the little rules around here. When you finally learn one, it changes. So, I guess I'll bug you for a loooong time. Bgwhite (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

You still have to add living=yes even if you add blp=yes. living=yes also does some other things that blp=yes does not. Bgwhite (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

re FP candidates/Portal:Athletics

Probably needs to wait a bit, to garner some support. — Cirt (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

User talk:The Polish

I prefer to talk in english here, we are in en.wiki, and we must talk in english, see you next time and good work/luck here, Kasper.--Petrik Schleck (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

IRC

No, suvvia, lo so. --The Polish (talk) 19:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Revert in Captain America: The First Avenger

See my edit summary in the article, though it might be worth a mention in the post production section, that covers this if a reliable source can be found. Also it should be pointed out that a variety of methods were used to achieve the slender look as stated in that section.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 06:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Also please see the essay regarding the Bold, revert, discuss cycle. Your edit was reverted and should not have re-reverted unless concensus to do so has been decided in discussion. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I was going to add a new section here, but I see that TriiipleThreat has already done so. My reasons for reversion are clearly stated - and are also adequate reasons for reversion - in the edit summary. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:56, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

WP Athletics in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Athletics for a Signpost article scheduled to coincide with this summer's European Athletics Championships. The article about WikiProject Athletics would serve as the beginning of a special "Summer Sports Series", giving you an excellent opportunity to draw attention to the project's efforts and attract new members. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Regarding your comment here, I think the primary issue with the portal is to do with formally recognised content; the project simply doesn't have enough of it. We need more than 20 articles of this type. A dedicated editor might be able to achieve this within two years. You appear to have frustrated people at the featured portal project, first by falsely claiming featured portal status, then by glossing over basic issues in the featured portal review. Try to focus on building content to a high standard before asking people to review it. SFB 11:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

That is because the criteria for assessing a featured portal are more demanding now. The tennis portal for example was promoted in 2008. Four years is a long time – the idea of a portal has only existed since 2005. You should compare the athletics portal to others which have been promoted recently. I could easily take the tennis portal for a review and get its featured status removed, but it's not a constructive issue and is not worth more than a minute of my time. SFB 11:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Aikido in the world games

No not censorship - please check the Aikido talk page for the discussion. I just implemented consensus. The information is just not considered useful for the article. If you disagree please add to the discussion.Peter Rehse (talk) 07:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Il tuo bot ha fatto un po di casini

Non posso fare niente al momento perchè sono stato bloccato. Quel tipo di modifiche non me le sono inventato io ma sono state richieste qui abbastanza tempo fa. Il problema è che qualcuno tempo fa in quella voce aveva scritto JUG al posto di YUG. Io non ci posso fare niente, l'operazione del bot è corretta ma è sbagliato mettere JUG al posto di YUG. Capisci? Quando mi sbloccheranno vedrò cosa fare. --The Polish (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Tiro del giavellotto

Lo so benissimo che il termine lancio del giavellotto è molto più usato, io stesso credo di non aver mai utilizzato il termine "tiro del giavellotto" in tutta la mia vita. Ad ogni modo non sono stato io l'autore del cambio di nome della voce, come puoi vedere dalla cronologia di Tiro del giavellotto. Comunque nella voce è spiegato il perchè della locuzione "tiro" al posto di "lancio". --Dre Rock (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Athletics

Is there a particular reason for adding biographies to the "selected article" section rather than the "selected biographies" section? Just wondering... Bencherlite^Talk 16:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

it:Tiro del giavellotto

Please have a look at page 112 of this document. Last sentence of chapter 3 is pretty clear. (Note: this is my sole and last contribute on en.wiki about an article of it.wiki) --Ysogo (talk) 22:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Elisa Cusma

Hi Kaspar. Given your reasoning, I have moved her article back to just "Cusma". Thanks for discussing this with me and sorry if I wasted your time! SFB 10:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, you got mail! Bye, --RibbeckHavelland (talk) 11:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Page moves

Hi Kaspar, see my comments here. SFB 18:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Ciao Kasper! Si, mi ricordo della problematica relativa alle scheda IAAF, infatti quando mi capita provvedo a correggerle; purtroppo credo siano diverse quelle non funzionanti sparse qua e là senza il parametro lettera. Un pò alla volta provvederemo. Cercherò di passare più spesso da queste parti, alla prossima ;) --Dre Rock (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gloria Hooper (sprinter)

The article Gloria Hooper (sprinter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTRACK. Only junior event that is notable is winning "individual gold medal at the IAAF World Junior Championships or Youth World Championships."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giorgia Benecchi

The article Giorgia Benecchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTRACK. Only junior event that is notable is winning "individual gold medal at the IAAF World Junior Championships or Youth World Championships."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marco Lorenzi

The article Marco Lorenzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTRACK. Only junior event that is notable is winning "individual gold medal at the IAAF World Junior Championships or Youth World Championships."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Flag usage

Hi Kaspar! Just noticed Renato Dionisi and the table section caught my eye. Unlike the Italian wikipedia, usages such as " Tokyo" are discouraged on English Wikipedia, with "Tokyo, Japan" being the preferred style. This makes the country clear to both traditional readers and those with Accessibility issues – while it's okay for major nations, we can't expect all our readers to know what is, let alone distinguish between and and and ! SFB 18:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, users can hover over the image to see the country, or we could get to the point at write that country name directly. It's about clarity: the information people want is "what country is that city in?", not "what is the flag of the country that that city is in?". That is the over-riding issue addressed at WP:MOSFLAG.

Perhaps even more important than that are the accessibility issues - if a disabled person uses screen reading software then they will simply be told "Flagicon INA", which is of no use to anyone. That is the reason why you will very rarely find any flags used on Wikipedia without the country name in text as well. SFB 15:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. That is much clearer now. SFB 16:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Athletics at the 1968 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 x 400 metres relay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vince Matthews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Riflessione sull'utilità della bandiera italiana in una lista di atleti italiani

Il fatto è che bisogna per forza valorizzare il parametro bandiera all'interno del tmp, altrimenti da errore. --Dre Rock (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Il template è stato fatto apposta per uniformare il tutto, quando si riuscirà a correggere il codice le bandiere si fa sempre a tempo a toglierle (senza dati inutili come la classe, che si può evincere tranquillamente dalla voce). Ad ogni modo scusami Kasper, ma non continuare a interpellarmi su it.wiki, questo non è il luogo adatto. Se hai cose da chiedermi su en.wiki ti risponderò volentieri, altrimenti non parliamone più. --Dre Rock (talk) 11:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Stefano Tilli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Espana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

I requested additional user rights for you.

I just requested you gain Autopatroll rights. Request is found here. This will help out people at WP:NPP because they don't need to review your articles. You know what you are doing and create good articles. Bgwhite (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Rudezza?

Sono sempre molto sorpreso dalle reazioni degli altri… Sopratutto dalla parte di un italiano verso un'altro italiano (o quasi), che si ostina a scrivermi in italiano su WP inglese malgrado il rispetto verso chi non lo parla (e il rispetto degli altri?). Poi, la rudezza, dove si trova? Dopotutto, anch'io ti rispondo in italiano (per forza). Inoltre, tu, come me, cerchiamo di migliorare ed aumentare le informazioni sugli atleti italiani (anche, perché non mi limito ai nazionali) e tu fai un grandissimo lavoro, che apprezzo e stimo (e non esagero). Ed invece di collaborare e di unire le forze, chi mi cerca le pulci? Io? Scherziamo?--Enzino (talk) 21:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Vedo che sei altrettanto ostinato quanto lo sarei io per gli atleti qualificati nella composizione delle staffette. Quelle che ho messo sono documentate, sia per HKG che per l'Italia. Certo, fino a qualche minuto prima della partenza, impossibile sapere chi sarà alla partenza (o almeno dalla Calling Room in poi). Ma quella pagina, non parla delle Entry Lists, pubblicate qualche giorno prima (e non la vigilia) ma delle Qualifiche e dei Qualificati… che non è la stessa cosa. Affatto. Molti degli atleti presenti sulle liste di qualifica non ci saranno sulla pista Mondo di Londra… perché feriti come l'Antonietta Di Martino (e non di Martino), squalificati, ecc… Oggi ho "tolto" un francese e uno spagnolo dei 3.000 siepi (EPO) che si erano già qualificati per Londra. Hai bisogno della fonte? Si trova su 2012 London, rubrica Athletes (in inglese e francese)… Tutti gli staffettisti ci sono…--Enzino (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Ti arrendi? Non capisco perché ci si debba arrendere, ognuno ha le sue opinioni, le sue caratteristiche. Ognuno migliora, a modo suo WP. Mi hai qualificato di noioso e di poco garbato. E anche di rude… E una piccola scusa, no? Però, che fare, in modo concreto per gli staffettisti? Lasciare come lo hai (già) lasciato due volte? O mettere i nomi che sono qualificati? Ti prego non rispondere sulla mia pagina ma qui… Preferirei…--Enzino (talk) 23:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Ci sono delle regole su wikipedia, non le ho fatte io. "Wikipedia non è una sfera di cristallo", non può prevedere il futuro. A me SFB ha cancellato la voce Gloria Hooper, perché pur avendo il minimo A olimpico, non avendovi ancora partecipato, non rientrava nei criteri, poi l'ha creata qualcun altro ed hanno sorvolato. Io anche ti reputavo un buon collaboratore, poi sono venuti 3 interventi bold: 1) Spostamento Bencosme a nome lunghissimo e NON usato nei pettorali, 2) Spostamento Eleonora Giorgi, che NON ESISTE AL MONDO che è conosciuta come Eleonora Anna Giorgi, lei l'Anna lo mette solo per distinguersi dall'attrice, ma in tutte le gare e classifiche FIDAL e solo Eleonora Giorgi. 3) questa cosa della staffetta e della veggenza. Se vogliamo tornare amici sii buono anche tu...dammi il tuo nick su FB (che una volta lo avevo trovato, con quella storia che eri missionario in Africa, e ne parliao lì). PS vedi che scrivere in italiano mica è vietato, e non è vero che sia irrispettoso, del resto che vuoi che freghi agli altri di una discussione in talk tra noi. --Kasper2006 (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Avresti qualcosa contro i doppi nomi? Leggo spesso i giornali italiani (tipo Repubblica o Gazzetta) ma soprattutto leggo il sito della FIDAL... Mica lo inventata io la forma Eleonora Anna Giorgi... Fra i 38 atleti italiani a Londra, è la sola che con Enrica Maria Spacca e José Reynaldo Bencosme de Leon, ha un doppio nome. SEMPRE. Anche quando l'amico Franco Bragagna, così pignolo, ne parla. Poco importa che un nome cosí lungo non rientri sul pettorale. Non sono stato a lungo in Africa. 6 mesi in Costa d'Avorio ma non sono mai stato missionario. Sono apostata. Non ricordo un nomignolo. Per me, esiste al mondo Eleonora Anna Giorgi perché così scrive la sua scheda La Repubblica oggi. Basta guardare. Sono per i fatti, non per la veggenza. Saluti.--Enzino (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ottoz family

Hello! Your submission of Ottoz family at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Athletics

I have added additional comments. Please see the latest entry. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Gelindo Bordin at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

You are wrong

The way I did it is consistent with the other tables. That's, y'know, why I did it that way. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 11:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Gelindo Bordin

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:02, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for cognitive vulnerability

Hey! This nomination template has been looked over and since the reviewer suggested a hook, ONLY THE HOOK needs to be looked over by another new reviewer. The rest of the article has been surely taken care of. If you have the time to just check it out, please do so. Thanks. Khyati Gupta (talk) 19:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Raffaello Ducceschi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Athlete

Saluzzo Race Walking School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Italian

Sandro Damilano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Coach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for creating the article Giorgio Damilano. With my good wishes! Tito Dutta ✉ 06:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Portal:Athletics: No consensus?

Nominator's support is usually disregarded because they have an inherent conflict of interest, especially in cases like this where the turnout was very low. Moreover, I'm sure some of the world records were broken at London Olympics this summer yet that portion is updated only up to May, which failed criteria 1(d) for not updating the portal regularly. It's "no consensus" and does not carry any prejudice for future nominations. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 06:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandro Donati, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doping and Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrea Giocondi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tivoli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Martina Caironi

Ciao, in effetti hai ragione. Gli errori sono dovuti al fatto che è la prima atleta che creo un'atleta (di solito mi occupo prevalentemente di calcio e basket) e l'ho fatto, come volendo puoi vedere dalla mia pagina discussioni sulla versione italiana, solo su richiesta di un altro utente :). Comunque grazie per le segnalazioni. --Nico.1907 (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Adding templates to articles

Hello, when adding templates to articles, as you did at Frank Ponta, there's no need for the "template:" prefix. Thanks! Graham87 14:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Il 14-lug-2010 spostasti Lancio del giavellotto a tiro e poi viceversa

Non ricordo di preciso...il termine giusto è tiro del giavellotto. --Cortix93 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)