Kathalu
Extended content
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sorry!edit... for my belated reply to your message on my talk page. I hope that my reply there clears things up. Good luck! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
I award you a barnstar
editThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
We don't always agree but I feel your efforts to maintain the quality of the Fritzl incest case article, especially in pointing out where things may have been distorted in translation, are worthy of a barnstar. Harry the Dog WOOF 06:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC) |
A rose for you
editExtended content
|
---|
I hope this helps you to feel less frustrated about the quality of translations. There's more to life than Wikipedia.
Sandbox
editYou're welcome for the barnstar. You certainly are getting the hang of things!
User:Kathlutz/sandbox is your sandbox. You can edit in it to your heart's content, then copy across to the article when you are ready.
Any time you want to delete one of your sub pages, just add db-userreq enclosed in {{ }} to the top of the page, and an admin will delete it for you. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
How to deal with VandalseditWell done for spotting and reverting vandalism to the article ! However, every time you deal with vandals, you should always leave a warning note on their Talk Page, I've already done it for you, look here [1] You should also read and study WP:Vandalism Tovojolo (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm intrigued: what's this thing about changing Austria to Australia repeatedly? What's their motivation - let's just do something naughty and silly, hehehe?--KathaLu (talk) 07:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the personal welcomeeditThanks for the welcome, but it is easier to add to talk pages than to maintain sometimes opposing standards on articles dealing with living people which is what I feel you and the other editors on that page are doing. I do not envy the task of conscientious wikipedia editors in working out the right balance. However I do not wish to edit that article and prefer to act as an unregistered user, while using this username for Talk and the convenience of a watchlist. -84user (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC) I don't know if you can get British Channel 4 but if you can, you should watch it as tomorrow, Wednesday 21 May 2008 at 9pm, Channel 4 is showing a one hour documentary on Josef Fritzl. It should be interesting to watch. Tovojolo (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Tovojolo (talk) 09:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC) NameseditI think you'll find this useful in understanding Wikipedia's policies [2]. Note the part about Ronald ad Nancy Reagan. Tovojolo (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I saw the problem you had with someone today. Remember if they reverse your edits 3 times in a 24 hour period, then you can report them to WP:3RR and they will be blocked from Wikipedia. It's a very powerful weapon to use against vandals. Tovojolo (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw your "undo" on my editing. In deleting the top part, you also deleted everything else I did to a later section! Next time, please delete exactly what you want instead of doing global "undo's". BTW, that point about there being 7 children and a miscarriage needs a source; I never saw it in any newspapers. Yoninah (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009editWelcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Fritzl case#Something weird is happening at the German Wikipedia are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 07:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC) December 2010editPlease do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. --John (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Time line sourceeditI appreciate the addition of the source. Your edits come across as somewhat hostile towards my attempts to improve sourcing for the most contentious content in the article. This is a biography of a living person WP:BLP, and poorly sourced content should universally either be removed or improved. When it comes to the actual content included, my only concern is adhering to established wikipedia policies. There is a huge difference between wanting good sourcing, and "playing some kind of Wiki editor". aprock (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
TalkbackeditHello, Kathalu. You have new messages at Victor falk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. |
Thank you
editYou have conveyed what I have seen but could not find the words to say.
Your comments on the Sweden v Assange talk page are insightful and helpful. -- Avanu (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Katha, just checking in, I tired of the isses surrounding the Assange articles, good to see you are still contributing, best. Off2riorob (talk) 00:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Idea
editCreate a mini-project to bring the articles of Neda, Mohamed Bouazizi, Khaled Said, and Hamza Ali Al-Khateeb up to GA/FA status. Possibly expand to include others whose deaths became symbols of war and peace (i.e. Pat Tillman). Would you like to work on something like this? Ocaasi t | c 23:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/HistoryBioLife. Might need a new name, but check it out... Ocaasi t | c 04:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)