Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Mochi (magazine) (August 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Kathykpham, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!


On Mochi

edit

I took a quick look at the sourcing list. One of the best things for the article is if you can find a third party newspaper article or magazine article with Mochi as the primary topic/subject of the article(s). Also try to base the Wikipedia article mainly around these secondary source articles. A chapter of a published book on Google Books may also help.

If you want I can help you look for such articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Francis Fowler Silver Collection at UCLA.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Francis Fowler Silver Collection at UCLA.jpg, which you've attributed to Fowler Museum. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

More sources

edit

Hi! I'm doing fine. Thanks for checking in!

I am still going though Google search results, but I found a report from SinoVision, an ethnic Chinese television channel, about the magazine:

This is a secondary source made independently of the subject, giving significant coverage. I'll keep you updated when I find more! WhisperToMe (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Her Campus also seems to be an independent source.

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also found these sites,

How many more sources do you think we should find? Kathykpham (talk) 04:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well, WP:GNG requires at least two. It's important to check the publisher of each source to ensure that it has "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (from Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources) and that it's published. I think both SinoVision and Her Campus should count as being properly published. I'll have to look at FoundAsian and HelloFlo to see if these publishers count. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your help so far. I really appreciate it. :) Kathykpham (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mochi (magazine) has been accepted

edit
 
Mochi (magazine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Chris troutman. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, California African American Museum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles logo by Mark Bradford.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles logo by Mark Bradford.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:API Forward Movement

edit
 

Hello, Kathykpham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "API Forward Movement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:API Forward Movement

edit
 

Hello, Kathykpham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "API Forward Movement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply