Your submission at Articles for creation: FuseTar (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 19:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Nearlyevil665, I added some sources but wanted to ask whether there is anyone in the community who could help me and check whether I understood it correctly before I resubmit the article? Would be helpful a lot go get some feedback. Thank you! KatrinKultur (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KatrinKultur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 19:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Nearlyevil665 thanks for the info. I'll try to learn what are the reliable sources and how to find them. KatrinKultur (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, thanks for the message. This could be helpful for you: Help:Find sources. nearlyevil665 10:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Nearlyevil665, it really helped to find additional sources. Overally process of searching for links or published materials is very time consuming. I have submitted the updated version but saw that it had broken the structure I offered. Should I adjust it or it is someone else offering improvements and I should better wait? KatrinKultur (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, thanks for the message. To be honest, I'm not yet convinced about the draft meeting notability requirements, but feel free to resubmit and someone else will review it. I'm not sure I'm well-placed to make that judgement with the new sources provided. nearlyevil665 10:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Nearlyevil665 thank you tons for the swift answer. Could you please recommend me someone in the community who is from music instruments or experimental instruments area or how I can find such and editor. I thinks that person could help me with further direction. KatrinKultur (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't know anyone from that field. The common practice is to submit and wait. But if you feel like you want to do something extra, you could try asking over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. nearlyevil665 11:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Then I'll submit and wait but meanwhile will learn how to communicate with other contributors. KatrinKultur (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Nearlyevil665 could you please help me with one more thing? some bot came and deleted a picture I chosen for my draft from wikipedia database. what can I do to return that picture? KatrinKultur (talk) 09:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I see it has been deleted on Commons for a copyright violation. I'm not really an expert on image deletions, but I found this page which might help you. nearlyevil665 12:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you@Nearlyevil665 for your support. it's quite complicated to understand how it works. I will try to ask if they can get that picture unarchived. KatrinKultur (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Nearlyevil665 Look what I found. There is similar article about a unique instrument https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikasso-Gitarre but it has no significant references at all. I believe I did good job collecting all those pieces and bits in various languages :) But I got additional question, is it allowed to mention luthiers and write article from the luthiers perspective but not the instrument itself as it is here ? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikasso-Gitarre KatrinKultur (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, unfortunately English Wikipedia has its own standards and other language wikis - their own. I'm not aware about German wiki's standards, but an article in that state would never survive on English Wikipedia. If I were to see an article like that, I'd do nominate it for deletion. See Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. nearlyevil665 06:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Experimental musical instrument. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Sorry, I'm new, I probably got it wrong. I just saw how previous Keyolin instrument linked and did by analogy linking to personal web site. Should that link to take to another source on the same topic? KatrinKultur (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuseTar (August 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:FuseTar

edit

  Hello, KatrinKultur. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FuseTar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:FuseTar

edit
 

Hello, KatrinKultur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FuseTar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply