Kbgem

Speedy deletion nomination of Dolphin Discovery San Jose Del Cabo B.C.S. Mexico

Hello Kbgem,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dolphin Discovery San Jose Del Cabo B.C.S. Mexico for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  09:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cabo Dolphins Cabo San Lucas B.C.S. Mexico

Hello Kbgem,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cabo Dolphins Cabo San Lucas B.C.S. Mexico for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  09:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cabo Dolphins San Jose Del Cabo B.C.S. Mexico

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cabo Dolphins San Jose Del Cabo B.C.S. Mexico requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Phileasson (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Kbgem! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Kbgem. I have just read your message at Talk:Cabo Dolphins San Jose Del Cabo B.C.S. Mexico. I do thoroughly sympathise with you. You come to Wikipedia, hoping to have a successful time here, and make useful contributions, only to see your first attempts rejected. Unfortunately, that is all too common an experience for new Wikipedia editors, and very often new editors who could have become very good contributors instead give up, disillusioned. I hope that you will stay, and that this rather bumpy start can be put behind you, so that you can have a better time here from now on. I will say a few things which I hope will help you.

Firstly, I strongly recommend not trying to create any new articles for a while. Instead, just make small improvements to existing articles. That way, you can gradually learn how Wikipedia works, and any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't see whole articles you have written scrapped, losing lots of work. After a time, you will know enough about what sort of thing is acceptable, and you will be able to write new articles without fear of all your work being deleted. In my experience, editors who start in this gentle way, making small changes to begin with, have a very much better chance of having a successful time here than those who try to write articles right from the start.

It is not necessary to have an article totally complete before posting it, but it is necessary to have at least enough content to tell us what the subject of the article is. A mere link to another web site on its own is not enough. Also, just posting a link to a commercial web site has the danger of looking as though it's spam. I am not suggesting that you meant it to be spam, but unfortunately a lot of people do post spam to Wikipedia, and so editors are likely to see such commercial links on their own, without content, as spam.

You say that the dolphin park has been there for only a few months. In that case, it may be that it has not yet received enough attention to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, in which case no article about it is likely to be acceptable. (Please note that I am not saying that the park is not notable. I have not searched for information about it, so I don't know whether it is or not, but I am mentioning that it may not be.) I suggest having a look at Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations before you consider writing any articles about businesses.

I am including (above) a "Welcome" message template. That includes links to various Wikipedia policies, guidelines, and other pages of information which may be helpful. Don't try to read all of them before you edit - there are far too many of them. However, do have at least a quick look at those that seem most relevant to your needs, and of course you can always come back to them in the future, as new needs arise.

Please do feel welcome to contact me on my talk page to ask for any other help. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)